昨天的作文狗阅读狗各一只

cetaphill

讲一个公司的information technology部门的manager 写的一份报告
说improvements in information technology对大部分工作时间都在用电脑的员工来说，可以提高他们的efficiency，进而提高公司的profit
材料特别简单 没啥隐含意思 我中间写了两段
1.false relationship，efficiency和profit没有必然联系
2.有他因，infor tech不是提高efficiency的唯一途径

阅读说的是科学家探究鸟类会飞的能力是如何进化得来的 提出两个理论 然后逐条进行了批驳 并没有扩展
第一个理论 说鸟类可能是先爬上树 再跳下来滑翔 最后进化成飞 提出A鸟（最早的鸟类，我觉得这个词应该是始祖鸟）和一些恐龙表亲的结构相似 化石表明它有爬树的能力 但是没有证据说明它确实可以证明这个理论 即没有它上树又滑翔的证据
第二个理论（看得匆忙，大意是这样） 说一些地上的恐龙跑的很快 后来跑得太快就扑腾起来了 逐渐就飞起来了 但是发现这些恐龙的前肢都很短 不太可能进化成翅膀（这不扯呢么。。。） 还提出了一些其他的动物例子

cetaphill

确认 Q3和Q6是我遇到的原题

cetaphill

请确认作文：
　　“The more efficient a firm’s employees are, the more profitable that firm will be. Improvements in a firm’s information technology hardware and software are a proven way to increase the efficiency of employees who do the majority of their work on computers. Therefore, if our firm invests in the most powerful and advanced information technology available, employee productivity will be maximized. This strategy ensures that every dollar spent on enhanced information technology will help to increase our firm’s profit margins.”

-- by 会员 AngieZZZ (2012/12/16 23:16:49)

确认！

ginnieqiu

Q 3: The primary purpose of the passage is to
A.    present counterevidence to two hypotheses concerning the origins of  bird flight
B.    propose and alternative to two hypotheses concerning the origins of bird flight
C.    correct certain misconceptions about hypotheses concerning the origins of bird flight
D.    refute a challenge to a hypothesis concerning the origins of bird flight
E.    evaluate competing hypotheses concerning the origins of bird flight
E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q 4: The passage presents which of the following facts as evidence that tends to undermine the arboreal hypothesis?
A.    Feathers tend to become larger over time
B.    Flapping flight is thought to have evolved gradually over time
C.    Many small animals are capable of climbing trees.
D.    lants in Archaeopteryx’s known habitats were relatively small
E.    Leaping into the air does not provide as much acceleration as gliding out of a tree
D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q 5: Which of the following is included in the discussion of the cursorial hypothesis but not in the discussion of the arboreal hypothesis?
A.    A discussion of some of the features of Archaeopteryx
B.    A description of the environment known to have been inhabited by bird ancestors
C.    A possible reason why bird ancestors might have been engaging in activities that eventually evolved into flight
D.    A description of the obvious features of animals with gliding ability
E.    An estimate of the amount of time it took for bird ancestors to evolve the kind of flapping flight that allowed them to become completely airborne
C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q 6: The passage suggests which of the following regarding the climbing ability of Archaeopteryx?

A.    Its ability to climb trees was likely hindered by the presence of incipient feathers on its forelimbs.
B.    It was probably better at climbing trees than were its maniraptoran dinosaur cousins.
C.    It had certain physical adaptations that suggest it was skilled at climbing trees.
D.    Scientists have recently discovered fossil evidence suggesting it could not climb trees.
E.    Scientists are uncertain whether it was capable of climbing trees
E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

ginnieqiu

亲，你的阅读是这篇么？GWD原题，求确认~~~

GWD27-Q 3 to Q6:

Two opposing scenarios, the “arboreal” hypothesis and the “cursorial” hypothesis, have traditionally been put forward concerning the origins of bird flight. The “arboreal” hypothesis holds that bird ancestors began to fly by climbing trees and gliding down from branches with the help of incipient feathers: the height of trees provides a good starting place for launching flight, especially through gliding. As feathers became larger over time, flapping flight evolved and birds finally became fully air-borne. This hypothesis makes intuitive sense, but certain aspects are troubling. Archaeopteryx (the earliest known bird) and its maniraptoran dinosaur cousins have no obviously arboreal adaptations, such as feet fully adapted for perching. Perhaps some of them could climb trees, but no convincing analysis has demonstrated how Archaeopteryx would have both climbed and flown with its forelimbs, and there were no plants taller than a few meters in the environments where Archaeopteryx fossils have been found. Even if the animals could climb trees, this ability is not synonymous with gliding ability. (Many small animals, and even some goats and kangaroos, are capable of climbing trees but are not gliders.) Besides, Archaeopteryx shows no obvious features of gliders, such as a broad membrane connecting forelimbs and hind limbs.

The “cursorial”(running) hypothesis holds that small dinosaurs ran along the ground and stretched out their arms for balance as they leaped into the air after insect prey or, perhaps, to avoid predators. Even rudimentary feathers on forelimbs could have expanded the arm’s surface area to enhance lift slightly. Larger feathers could have increased lift incrementally, until sustained flight was gradually achieved. Of course, a leap into the air does not provide the acceleration produced by dropping out of a tree; an animal would have to run quite fast to take off. Still, some small terrestrial animals can achieve high speeds. The cursorial hypothesis is strengthened by the fact that the immediate theropod dinosaur ancestors of birds were terrestrial, and they had the traits needed for high lift off speeds: they were small, agile, lightly built, long-legged, and good runners. And because they were bipedal, their arms were free to evolve flapping flight, which cannot be said for other reptiles of their time.

oytt1111

求逻辑

FFD2012

找到了 GWD里面的   GWD-27-Q3-Q6 鸟为什么会飞的两种理论

FFD2012

这个阅读好熟啊   好像GWD里面还是prep2012里做过

charlesyu

作文要得高分，不要只说逻辑上的错误。要把当做一个BUSINESS CASE来分析，这样才有内容。套模板很教条，千篇一律，判券老师不爱读啊。就是套模板，不能留下痕迹。

-- by 会员 wrongway (2012/12/16 13:25:02)

Agree!