求助feifei 75

hkznba

Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating one sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

A.    The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.
B.    Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.
C.    The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.
D.    eople who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.
E.    It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.
请问为什么选C 呢 看了不少讲解，还是不明白，请问谁能写的通俗明白一点 谢谢啦

BLAZEBLAZE

susielei 发表于 2012-7-14 13:08
背景：Advertisers motivated by moral as well as financial considerations事件: a particular publicati ...

厉害！！

susielei

背景：Advertisers motivated by moral as well as financial considerations
事件: a particular publication将 image改成了以sex and violence为主，以此吸引读者
结果：Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication
结论：this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material
所以选项C，意思是advertisers知道如下情况：他们如果继续在改变后的杂志上发布广告，将会增加sales;如果他们withdraw，sales将会减少。那么为什么还是要withdraw呢，也就是说此时advertisers已经不考虑financial方面了,而是考虑了moral方面，advertiser morally disapproved,所以他们withdraw了，因此加强了的文章的结论。

额……不知道楼主是否能够看懂