求助求助~PREP1Q13~

evelyn205205

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

United States manufacturers currently produce most of the world's solar-power generators--most of which are exported to Europe.However, European manufacturers are emerging and probably will ultimately capture much of the European market.The United States government is funding initiatives intended to encourage use of solar power within the United States.If these initiatives succeed in increasing the demand for solar-power generators in the United States, United States manufacturers will probably maintain significant production levels, since __________.

(A) Some United States manufacturers have been substantially increasing their output over the last several years

(B) The efficiency of solar-power generators in converting energy from the Sun into electric power is not improving as fast as it once did

(C) Just as European manufacturers enjoy certain competitive advantages in Europe, so do United States manufacturers in the United States

(D) European governments are currently undertaking initiatives to stimulate the use of solar power within Europe

(E) The current market for solar-power generators in the United States is very limited

答案：C。
我想问的是为什么D不对呢？美国准备在本土开展这个刺激计划，因为欧洲方面也已经在实施类似的计划来扩大太阳能在欧洲地区的使用，所以为了扩大销售，美国也采取同样的方法嘛~这样的理解哪里出错了呢？
在此求助于各位NN啦~

evelyn205205

Look back the last sentence"If these initiatives succeed in increasing the demand for solar-power generators in the United States, United States manufacturers will probably maintain significant production levels, since __________.
"
The statement assumes that the initiatives will increase the demand for solar power generators, but it doesn't mean it will increase the demand for "Made in US" solar power generators exclusively.
Therefore, US manufacturers may still have to face the competition from other foreign manufacturers including European manufacturers.
So, how US manufacturers can maintain its significant production? They have to be competitive enough against foreign manufacturers.
In D, it says US manufacturers have competitive edge in US, just as European manufacturers have in EU.

-- by 会员 helenlife (2011/7/26 7:26:23)

THX FOR YOUR DETAILED EXPLANATION.
SO THIS CR QUESTION IS MORE LIKE A ASSUMPTION, RIGHT?

evelyn205205

我不是nn，但是我defendC选项原因如下：
1.since题答案应该与since前半句有关，至少是一个主语，才能加强，并不是在说对立面；
2.since前半句的预测结果说的是美国要是这样做了，产量就会恢复，为啥子呢？找的是产量会恢复的直接原因，觉得你的辩解是间接原因——如果按照你的逻辑，原文最后一句就是“如果美国能够刺激内需，那么美国的产量就将会恢复到原来的水平，因为欧洲正在刺激内需”，你不觉得要使只看这句话不是很诡异吗？美国怎么样和欧洲有什么关系？
原文思路：美国很牛，占了欧洲一点市场---欧洲的场子正在增多而且将会霸占欧洲的市场--美国正在刺激内需--若刺激成功，就会维持高产量，因为欧洲有比较优势，美国也有啊！
简化一下就是：A很牛叉，B比较差，B出现了变强的趋势，和A形成了竞争，A想维持老大地位，用钱猛砸，若砸成功，还是老大，因为B你可能有自己的比较优势，我们A也有啊（比如我们有钱），只不过以前没有被激发出来罢了，并不是说因为你B正在砸，还没有结果，还不构成现成的成功经验，所以我们砸就一样一定会成功。
哎，我也不是解释得很好，你有点明白了没？

-- by 会员 王梦醒 (2011/7/26 0:27:08)

谢谢你，梦醒，你解释的相当好，深入浅出，我真的理解了！

pc123

我是这么想的：

1.背景：European manufacturers are emerging and probably will ultimately capture much of the European market.The United States government is funding initiatives intended to encourage use of solar power within the United States.--》说明市场重要
2.结论：If these initiatives succeed in increasing the demand for solar-power generators in the United States, United States manufacturers will probably maintain significant production levels维持产量---》保持市场份额
3.分析choice
(A) 产量增加与售量和市场份额无关
(B) 无关
(C) 美货在本土会享受到欧货在本土享受的特殊待遇---》会有市场的优惠
(D) 表示EU会支持本洲产业，美货难以打入
(E) Weaken

helenlife

Look back the last sentence"If these initiatives succeed in increasing the demand for solar-power generators in the United States, United States manufacturers will probably maintain significant production levels, since __________.
"
The statement assumes that the initiatives will increase the demand for solar power generators, but it doesn't mean it will increase the demand for "Made in US" solar power generators exclusively.
Therefore, US manufacturers may still have to face the competition from other foreign manufacturers including European manufacturers.
So, how US manufacturers can maintain its significant production? They have to be competitive enough against foreign manufacturers.
In D, it says US manufacturers have competitive edge in US, just as European manufacturers have in EU.

王梦醒

since题关键是最后一句，原因至少要提到since前的主要论述对象，这才是最强大的原因，我觉得。应该做到单拿出最后一句也是成立的。反正要是缜密的推理，也可以论证D选项是绝对不对的，二C是绝对对的。
希望能帮到你。

王梦醒

我不是nn，但是我defendC选项原因如下：
1.since题答案应该与since前半句有关，至少是一个主语，才能加强，并不是在说对立面；
2.since前半句的预测结果说的是美国要是这样做了，产量就会恢复，为啥子呢？找的是产量会恢复的直接原因，觉得你的辩解是间接原因——如果按照你的逻辑，原文最后一句就是“如果美国能够刺激内需，那么美国的产量就将会恢复到原来的水平，因为欧洲正在刺激内需”，你不觉得要使只看这句话不是很诡异吗？美国怎么样和欧洲有什么关系？
原文思路：美国很牛，占了欧洲一点市场---欧洲的场子正在增多而且将会霸占欧洲的市场--美国正在刺激内需--若刺激成功，就会维持高产量，因为欧洲有比较优势，美国也有啊！
简化一下就是：A很牛叉，B比较差，B出现了变强的趋势，和A形成了竞争，A想维持老大地位，用钱猛砸，若砸成功，还是老大，因为B你可能有自己的比较优势，我们A也有啊（比如我们有钱），只不过以前没有被激发出来罢了，并不是说因为你B正在砸，还没有结果，还不构成现成的成功经验，所以我们砸就一样一定会成功。
哎，我也不是解释得很好，你有点明白了没？

evelyn205205

有谁来帮帮我~~~NN们~

evelyn205205

求NN指教~

evelyn205205

继续顶~