ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6325|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12-28题求解

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-21 10:59:52 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
28.  The technological conservatism of bicycle

manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand
they are trying to meet. The only cyclists seriously
interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are
bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle
technology is limited by what authorities will accept as
standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races.

Which of the following is an assumption made in
drawing the conclusion above?

A. The market for cheap, traditional bicycles
cannot expand unless the market for high-
performance competition bicycles expands.



B. High-performance bicycles are likely to be
improved more as a result of technological
innovations developed in small workshops than
as a result of technological innovations
developed in major manufacturing concerns.

C. Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand
for innovations that fall outside what is officially
recognized as standard for purposes of
competition.

D. The technological conservatism of bicycle
manufacturers results primarily from their desire
to manufacture a product that can be sold
without being altered to suit different national
markets.

       E. The authorities who set standards for high-
              performance bicycle racing do not keep
               informed about innovative bicycle design
答案是C,看了解释,还不是很明白,有哪位大侠能解释一下思路吗,谢谢
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
6#
发表于 2013-8-23 22:38:56 | 只看该作者
虽然是gap型,能从premise+ assump=con这个结构来答案,不知为什么一直感到突兀,没有那种直接gap的感觉,终于看了几遍发现漏看第一局话的作用:manufacture 要满足racer的demand;而 innovation is limited(也就是说manufacture的demand是有limited) ,随后可知racer是有limited.
5#
发表于 2013-8-23 22:08:13 | 只看该作者
NO ONLY GAP MODEL COULD USE;
          DEFENDER MODEL COULD NOT USE
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-21 12:05:26 | 只看该作者
明白了,谢谢楼上2位了。顺便说下,是不是找assumptions的题都可以用premise+assumption=conclusion这个方法呢?
板凳
发表于 2011-7-21 11:50:31 | 只看该作者
同意楼上~说下我的理解
premise:真正对技术革新感兴趣并为其支付费用的只有racers.
conclusion:技术革新受限于官方认可的Standard.
找assumptions;
根据premise+assumption=conclusion,假设要把racers和standard 联系起来,相当于架个桥梁,即:racers只对官方认可的standard的技术革新感兴趣。其逆否命题就是,如果革新的Standard不受官方认可,racers就不会感兴趣,就是C选项了。
沙发
发表于 2011-7-21 11:11:27 | 只看该作者
原文的意思是说:自行车制造商的技术守旧反映了他们设法去迎合的需求。真正对技术革新感兴趣且愿意为此支付费用的骑自行车的人只有自行车竞赛运动员。所以,自行车的技术革新只限于官方接受的以自行车竞赛为目的的标准。

前提:真正对技术革新感兴趣且愿意为此支付费用的骑自行车的人只有自行车竞赛运动员。
结论:自行车的技术革新只限于官方接受的以自行车竞赛为目的的标准。

问题:基于什么样的假设才能得出上述结论。

C选项:如果革新的标准官方不认可,自行车竞赛运动员就不会感兴趣。正好把前提和结论联系起来了。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-30 16:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部