ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 14721|回复: 17
打印 上一主题 下一主题

有一道很迷惑的逻辑

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-6-20 23:37:25 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
d54.    (33519-!-item-!-188;#058&007577)   B

The pharmaceutical industry argues that because new drugs will not be developed unless heavy development costs can be recouped in later sales, the current 20 years of protection provided by patents should be extended in the case of newly developed drugs.  However, in other industries new-product development continues despite high development costs, a fact that indicates that the extension is unnecessary.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the pharmaceutical industry's argument against the challenge made above?

(A) No industries other than the pharmaceutical industry have asked for an extension of the 20-year limit on patent protection.
(B) Clinical trials of new drugs, which occur after the patent is granted and before the new drug can be marketed, often now take as long as 10 years to complete.
(C) There are several industries in which the ratio of research and development costs to revenues is higher than it is in the pharmaceutical industry.
(D) An existing patent for a drug does not legally prevent pharmaceutical companies from bringing to market alternative drugs, provided they are sufficiently dissimilar to the patented drug.
(E) Much recent industrial innovation has occurred in products--example, in the computer and electronics industries--which patent protection is often very ineffective.

答案为什么是B啊   绞尽脑汁也想不明白啊
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
18#
发表于 2018-8-7 09:09:18 | 只看该作者
camelo777 发表于 2011-6-22 07:29
题目说制药业要求延长这个20年的patents protection,因为他们说不延长的话以后的sale弥补不了前期的大量研 ...

同意!               
17#
发表于 2017-12-29 21:53:34 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
16#
发表于 2017-7-17 16:44:31 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
15#
发表于 2017-7-3 22:11:49 | 只看该作者
大橘子 发表于 2017-4-26 19:27
对于D的解释:医药行业希望延长专利因为他们觉得without extension they can not recoup the cost;然而d选 ...

同意!               
题目是个premise与conclusion为因果关系,

B) 补充资料说明因果关系正确
D) 举出他因 --> 削弱
14#
发表于 2017-4-26 19:27:33 | 只看该作者
对于D的解释:医药行业希望延长专利因为他们觉得without extension they can not recoup the cost;然而d选项说patent不能避免医药行业引进替代品,而这些替代品实质上可以帮助他们弥补这些成本,就意味着不用通过延长的方式来弥补了。这应该是一个weaken选项
13#
发表于 2017-2-16 02:46:24 | 只看该作者
Lily况月培 发表于 2015-2-15 23:27
同问 D选项该如何解释呢

感觉和题目所想要讨论的相关性不大
12#
发表于 2015-6-23 23:23:53 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
11#
发表于 2015-5-17 17:11:57 | 只看该作者
Lily况月培 发表于 2015-2-15 23:27
同问 D选项该如何解释呢

D把scope变掉了
说你嫌这个药赚得少你可以卖别的非专利药来赚回来啊,只要不是挂羊头卖狗肉~~~
这里就是指一个专利期内的一种药,扯别的就不对了
感谢提问让我研究了下本来不打算细究的D选项

对A的理解是:
A: challenge用的类比来反驳Phar, A就是补充了具体的fact来证明两个industry是不一样的,所以类比是无效的.以此来守卫自己的观点(理解到这里不知道够不够?还是需要像camelo777继续延伸到"少赚了很多钱"上面去?)
简单来说就是support类型题可不可以有"踩对方就是顶己方"的逻辑, 还是需要从正面来证明己方观点的确实性,
10#
发表于 2015-2-15 23:27:41 | 只看该作者
同问 D选项该如何解释呢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-9 17:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部