求助OG 逻辑104题

eyes123

104. Although the discount stores in Goreville’s central shopping district are expected to close within fi ve years as a
result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not
stay vacant for long. In the fi ve years since the opening of Colson’s, a nondiscount department store, a new
store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete
with Colson’s.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) Many customers of Colson’s are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess
store opened.
(B) Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been
discount stores.
(C) At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.
(D) Over the course of the next fi ve years, it is expected that Goreville’s population will grow at a faster rate
than it has for the past several decades.
(E) Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either
SpendLess or Colson’s.

rikihsu

我的理解是。。。

原文的意识是，作者认为在折扣店S开了以后G那里的折扣店在5年内都会关门，但是那里并不会空闲很久。为什么呢？作者举了个例子，说是在非折扣店C开了以后的5年里面，那些因为竞争不过C的店关门之后都有新的店开出来了。所以结论是。。同样的G那里也会有新店开张。

B，详细说明那些在竞争不过C之后关门后又开出来的店是其实是折扣店。。因为C是非折扣店，所以没有竞争可言，而他们作为折扣店自然还是会竞争不过S。因为他们都是折扣店。

colasama

记住这句话：有些店是discount的，有些是nondiscount。两种情况不一样。

然后多读几遍题，然后搅一搅脑子~~就明白了

eyes123

谢谢6楼，但是网页好像已经打不开了。

kate198501

http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-443076-1-1.html

看看去年大侠们的讨论。希望能帮到你

jiyou

这题我也没看懂

mudiduange

类比论证的方式哈，我觉得这样的题很典型，一般就是用两个场景类比，然后说因为有XX相似，于是得出一个结论。这种题也最容易出，驳斥啊，假设啊，支持啊，都很好出，但思路比较一致。

既然二者类比，是由相似性得出一个结论，那么如果能说出，二者相比还存在一些不同，则可以驳斥结论。

eyes123

顶。OG上的解释我看不大清楚。

connie飘着

同问，同问。 虽然我自己想了一下，但是依然不是很清楚逻辑关系。。。那个高手指点一下啊。

sdcar2010

Search for related posts in this forum.