求助一道GWD-TN-24的逻辑题~~

紫诺

Editorial:In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance.To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply.However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed.Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?
A.The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.

B.Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.

C.People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.

D.The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.

E.People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.

答案是C，怎么都看不懂啊。。。


A.The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.

B.Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.

C.People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.

D.The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.

E.People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.

答案是C，怎么都看不懂啊。。。

紫诺

啊，明白了~~~THX

kikisunflower

原文条件：工资补贴后还是超不过低保→结论：有工资补贴的那些工作吸引不了人

原文逻辑就是说人们会因为工资不比低保高，就还是在家拿低保，而不工作。

C指出现在工作，虽然暂时工资不比低保高，但是以后就有钱赚了，这样这些工作对人们还是有吸引力的，削弱原文逻辑。