Q25: Scientists typically do their most creative work before the age of forty.It is commonly thought that this happens because aging by itself brings about a loss of creative capacity.However, a study has found that almost all scientists who produce highly creative work beyond the age of forty entered their fields late and less than a dozen years before their creative breakthroughs.Since creative breakthroughs by scientists under forty also generally occur within a dozen years of the scientist’s entry into the field, the study’s finding strongly suggests that the real reason why scientists over forty rarely produce highly creative work is not due to age but rather because most have spent too long in their fields.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
The first is the position that the argument as a whole defends; the second is evidence that is advanced as part of that defense.
The first and second are both claims that have been advanced in support of a position that the argument as a whole opposes.
The first is an explanation that the argument challenges; the second provides evidence in support of a competing explanation that the argument defends.
The first is an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is evidence that has been used against an alternative explanation that the argument defends.
The first is an explanation that the argument defends; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge that explanation. 为什么是C?我选了E! challenge有什么不一样么?
【一个现象】Scientists typically do their most creative work before the age of forty. 【前一个现象的解释】It is commonly thought that this happens because aging by itself brings about a loss of creative capacity.【一个转折的现象,否定之前的解释】 However, studies show that of scientists who produce highly creative work beyond the age of forty, a disproportionately large number entered their field at an older age than is usual. 【转折部分的解释】Since by the age of forty the large majority of scientists have been working in their field for at least fifteen years, the studies’ finding strongly suggests that the real reason【主结论】 why scientists over forty rarely produce highly creative work is not that they have aged but rather that 【真正正确的主结论的解释】scientists over forty have generally spent too long in their field