ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2201|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

AA01, 自己瞎写,快要考了,争取每天一篇,发出来自我监督一下

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-1-6 00:24:29 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
The conclusion drawn here is that Olympic Food can improve its efficiency on food processing because of its long experience in the industry, hence minimize the costs and maximize the profits. To substantiate the statement, an example of film processing is provided, stating that the film processing have a improved efficiency and decreased cost over time, assuming the analogy between food processing and film processing, the argument attempts to convince the reader that the long experience will bring the same effect to Olympic Food which operates in food processing business.


the potential fallacies which lie behind the argument/reasoning are obvious. below we will identify two main flaws in this argument:


Firstly the analogy between film processing and food processing is quite unconvincing. since mainly the cost of film processing depends on the cost of chemical compounds and the processing techniques, while that of food processing depends on the cost of raw materials. the price elasticities of those commodities on the market could be quite different, hence it is not reasonable to expect those two industries to yield similar results for the sake for long time experiences.


Secondly the total cost of a company usually has a quite complexed composition. the costs includes not only operational cost, which are referring to the food processing cost in Olympic Food's case, but also many other costs such as administrative cost and logistic cost. minimizing one part of it is going to decrease the whole costs, but not sufficient to minimize the total costs.


To summarize, the conclusion drawn is inadequate, because the author failed in providing sufficient evidences and making a convincing reasoning. To support the conclusion, the author needs to identify for the food processing techniques used in Olympic food and to provide more details for the company's financial status.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
地板
发表于 2011-1-6 17:44:24 | 只看该作者
LZ不用太担心写作,评分人很NICE的。我考前至少几个月没写过英文,而且偷懒也没练,结果还给了我个4.5。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-6 14:14:05 | 只看该作者
thanks for the commets dude.
沙发
发表于 2011-1-6 01:16:46 | 只看该作者
long experience --> extensive experience

stating that the film processing have a improved efficiency

the costs includes not only operational cost
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 06:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部