ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass surgery-a procedure widely prescribed for people with heart disease-only 75 percent benefited from the surgery. Thus it appears that for one in four such patients, the doctors who advised them to undergo this surgery, with its attendant risks and expense, were more interested in an opportunity to practice their skills and in their fee than in helping the patient.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5453|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

再问GWD7-Q17关于前提结论型 和 因果型

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-8-31 13:55:32 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
我看过FEIFEI的视频课件。也一直以来使用前提结论型因果型来解题,感觉效果不错的,但是GWD7-Q17有疑惑:
============================================================================
GWD7-
Q17:

Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass surgery—a procedure widely prescribed for people with heart disease—only 75 percent benefited from the surgery.Thus it appears that for one in four such patients, the doctors who advised them to undergo this surgery, with its attendant risks and expense, were more interested in an opportunity to practice their skills and in their fee than in helping the patient.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

A.    Many of the patients who receive coronary bypass surgery are less than 55 years old.

B.    Possible benefits of coronary bypass surgery include both relief from troubling symptoms and prolongation of life.

C.    Most of the patients in the survey decided to undergo coronary bypass surgery because they were advised that the surgery would reduce their risk of future heart attacks.

D.    The patients over 65 years old who did not benefit from the coronary bypass surgery were as fully informed as those who did benefit from the surgery as to the risks of the surgery prior to undergoing it.

E.    The patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery but who did not benefit from it were medically indistinguishable, prior to their surgery, from the patients who did benefit.



题目是说 65岁以上的人接受心脏搭桥手术,其中只有75%的人能够得到改善;剩下的1/4 人,都是医生昧着良心送入手术室的

我的疑惑是,到底是因果型,还是前提结论型?

我自己看的时候,觉得是用后半句,去解释前半句。也就是用医生昧良心来解释只有75%的成功。如果是这样来削弱的话,应该是

1.其他原因解释只有75%的成功。(他因解释)

2.医生昧良心成功率也不仅仅75%。(有因无果)

3. 医生没有昧良心但是成功率只有75% (无因有果)

4. 医生没有昧良心而且成功率也没有仅仅75%。(无因无果)



而如果是按照前提结论来解题,思路是:否定结论医生没有昧良心

正确答案E指医生不知道哪些病人会成功,哪些不会成功。正是用了前提结论的做法。



虽然选对了。但是这个疑惑一直在。不知道大家会不会觉得我是太死板了还是求指导!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
5#
发表于 2010-12-6 16:38:26 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
地板
发表于 2010-9-3 19:12:29 | 只看该作者
我认为
这题是因果型
现象: 75%成功
结论: 医生进行练习
结论解释现象
削弱方式 反对前提(在这里前提就是结论,因为是结论去解释现象) 医生无法利用手术进行练习(既看不到结果)
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-1 11:17:12 | 只看该作者
谢谢LS的同学~~ 恩。。。。考场上速度要快。 但是考场以外,,还是希望谁能解决下我的这个问题。。。
沙发
发表于 2010-9-1 01:55:36 | 只看该作者
没有研究过什么因果性,结论性的童鞋默默飘过~
不过我也觉得很多时候不用这么死扣这个的~
到了考场上根本不会考虑神马神马型滴~
木有时间还推来推去,还取非。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 11:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部