【HELP】GWD25-Q3.---帖子看了好多好多。。。都没有我问的。。。

fannybeibei

Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.
Pat:  No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects
D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial
E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group.

我做这题时这样看的：
mel:因为禁令不能教书和上课而导致收入少
pat:禁令不影响，因为老师很少上课和教书啊.(当然啦。。。因为有禁令了，怎么敢再教书呢。。。)

所以：
禁令推出 导致了 老师不教书
而不是
老师不教书  导致了 禁令推了也不影响

所以B，但本题A(虽然我也明白A，实在不明白B有什么错）
求各位NN相助！

hanshipeng

A. 第二个人说，只有少数人教书获得外快从而弥补工资低的问题。 但是这个现象指示目前的情况。或许将来的法官想通过教书演讲获得收入。 这样，仅仅涨工资，并不能吸引人到这个行业。例如：美国服务员工资低或者为0. 收入来自消费。 如果给他们涨1000刀的工资，但取消消费制度。单从工资来看，better。但是对于服务员，就不干了。此题和这个相似，只不过犯的错误是，把现在的现象当成永恒了。

skyemotion

是否禁止教书和进入该行业的人数没有必然关系。

lllmmm

B根本就不沾边

灰灰糖

这是一个绝佳的argument题目 且用七宗罪分析之- -

estherly

看大家讨论这道题完全没有选D呢……为什么D不行呢

祝歌靓

首先题干是judges不是teachers，然后M说虽然提高工资却限制了讲座和授课的收入是情况没有改善作用，这是对每一个judge来说的。而P说因为讲座和授课的judge人数few，都是拿工资 而工资提高了，所以不会有影响，这只是现在的情况，题干中说目的是吸引优秀求职者，所以不能保证以后的Judge不会讲座和授课。B中的change是指提高工资却限制讲座和授课收入，而B 认为cause和effect指很少的judges会讲座和教课，显然这不是原因，也不是影响，而是为了反驳M所说的影响的一个理由。E完全不靠谱

zinniz

我也选了E

秋扇

这道题我选了E……有没有NN帮我解释一下……

fannybeibei

thanks, try to answer c,pls correct me if i am wrong
attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects

IMO, changes refer to a raise in salary
while the absence of negative effects refers to the effects of a ban

所以C并没有在说一件事，并没有比较同一个问题的影响。