ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1636|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

CXD P258-34

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-25 22:04:56 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.

The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?

A  Where public-sector workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.

B  Where strikes by all categories of public-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.

C  Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.

D  Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.

E  A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from and arbitrator.

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-25 20:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部