问一道大家都做过的新东方经典题

wxxgw27

Guidebook writer:I have visited hotels throughout the country and  have noticed that those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built  subsequently.
Which of the following, if ture ,most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?
A.The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of  original carpentry in other structures, such as house and stores
B.Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
C.The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
D.The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
E.The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
这道题选D，用排除法做我都明白其他选项是怎么错的，可是就是想不明白D为什么对。拜托各位大牛给解释一下，为什么D是对的？ （除了用排除法排除其他选项）谢谢！

zzloveyibo

选B的都是用了XDF所用的错误经典用法：自high

leleshirley

WXX正解～今天看OG12正好看到这题，就是这个意思

leadwest

B.Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
Hotel住人的多少和木工活儿的质量是无关比较。
如果您认为“1930以后的hotel住人更多，因此木头家具更容易受损，因此看起来质量更差”，那么就是过度推理。

D.The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
这明显是给出它因的削弱。因此选D。

cheers!

moonlolita

我感觉这题目B和D都怪，虽然早先想通了D，但很难第一感觉做对

moonlolita

能否确认先，这题到底选什么？

ajassmine

就是原题是A——B进行削弱C——B。 C就是他因，只要有C ，A就被削弱了

-- by 会员 wxxgw27 (2009/11/22 16:24:55)

明白了，谢谢

ajassmine

我的理解是因为住着看到的房子都是1930年以前质量好的留下来的，所以不能收1930前的质量都好，因为不好的他没看到。进而削弱了，因为他是拿以前的精英和现在的普遍比，没有可比性！这样理解对吗？谢谢！

-- by 会员 wxxgw27 (2009/11/22 16:31:03)

你讲的很有道理。呵，AGREE~

wxxgw27

我的理解是因为住着看到的房子都是1930年以前质量好的留下来的，所以不能收1930前的质量都好，因为不好的他没看到。进而削弱了，因为他是拿以前的精英和现在的普遍比，没有可比性！这样理解对吗？谢谢！

wxxgw27

就是原题是A——B进行削弱C——B。 C就是他因，只要有C ，A就被削弱了