ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3894|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

急!!请大家帮忙看看OG11几道题!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-9 21:34:11 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式


87    Networks of blood vessels in bats' wings serve only to disperse heat generated in flight. This heat is generated only because bats flap their wings. Thus paleontologists' recent discovery that the winged dinosaur Sandactylus had similar networks of blood vessels in the skin of its wings provides evidence for the hypothesis that Sandactylus flew by flapping its wings, not just by gliding.                                                      

The argument in the passage relies on which of the following assumptions?

(A)      Sandactylus would not have had networks of blood vessels in the skin of its wings if these networks were of no use to Sandactylus.

(B)      All creatures that fly by flapping their wings have networks of blood vessels in the skin of their wings.

(C)      Winged dinosaurs that flapped their wings in flight would have been able to fly more effectively than winged dinosaurs that could only glide.

(D)      If Sandactylus flew by flapping its wings, then paleontologists would certainly be able to find some evidence that it did so.

(E)      Heat generated by Sandactylus in flapping its wings in flight could not have been dispersed by anything other than the blood vessels in its wings.



Reasoning What assumption does this argument make? The networks of blood vessels in the wings of bats are shown to have a purpose: to disperse the heat generated by wing-flapping flight. In proposing that a similar structure had a similar purpose in Sandactylus, the argument assumes that the network of blood vessels found in the dinosaur wings had a purpose.

觉得文章的解释和A选项联系不起来,因为A选项是文章解释的反面,难道正着推理是正确的,取非之后也能说明是正确的?想知道这道题的思路是怎样的,请高手帮帮忙吧?对这个题目很混乱!~



62. During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis of those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian.

Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?

(A)      Counting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United States in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseas

(B)      Expressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deaths

(C)      Separating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuries

(D)      Comparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deaths

             E)Comparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forces



我怎么觉得这道题这么难,我一点都没有看懂它是什么意思?答案是D。烦请各位高手能说说这道题的意思和它的逻辑推理吗?拜托了,我看了很久这道题,没有看懂~~



请大家帮帮忙吧!!逻辑处于非常混乱的状况,谢谢了~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-19 17:37:23 | 只看该作者
明白,谢谢楼上提醒
6#
发表于 2009-11-18 10:36:50 | 只看该作者
一般比较安全不安全肯定是比较死亡比率的,没有 基数,只比较死亡绝对数不能说明任何问题。比如 一个国家有1000人,死了10个,和另外一个国家有10个,死了3个,问哪个国家死亡率高,更不安全。肯定是第二个国家啊,虽然死亡人数少。这个和本题一个道理,虽然海外死亡人数多,但是,派出去的人肯定不和待在国内的人数一致,所以没办法说哪个更安全。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-17 16:26:17 | 只看该作者
二战期间,死在国内的人数是375000,死在国外的是408000,这说明待在国外也不见得比在国内危险。
D的意思是说要比较死亡率,而不是比较死亡总数
-- by 会员 dengyichao (2009/11/9 23:02:54)



谢谢你的解释,不过我还是想问一下,这个题目的结论明显是错误的啊,它的题目这样出,会不会太奇怪了

一般人看完这两个数据,得出的结论都会是,国内比国外安全,这么荒唐的结论让人去WEAKEN,让人感觉特别奇怪
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-17 16:16:07 | 只看该作者
蝙蝠翅膀血管里的网状物是用来散发飞行中产生的热量的,这种热量来源于翅膀的拍打。最近发现dinosaur Sandactylus 也有类似的网状物,这个发现表明dinosaur Sandactylus 也是通过拍打翅膀飞行的,而不是滑翔
这个结论显然需要一个假设。。因为拍打飞行需要有网状物,有网状物就一定是拍打飞行吗?这需要有一个假设,就是这个网状物一定是有用的,否则不会长
-- by 会员 verylotus (2009/11/9 22:13:03)



谢谢你的解释~~看了几遍,明白了,不过还要反复揣摩,真心的谢谢你!~
板凳
发表于 2009-11-9 23:02:54 | 只看该作者
二战期间,死在国内的人数是375000,死在国外的是408000,这说明待在国外也不见得比在国内危险。
D的意思是说要比较死亡率,而不是比较死亡总数
沙发
发表于 2009-11-9 22:13:03 | 只看该作者
蝙蝠翅膀血管里的网状物是用来散发飞行中产生的热量的,这种热量来源于翅膀的拍打。最近发现dinosaur Sandactylus 也有类似的网状物,这个发现表明dinosaur Sandactylus 也是通过拍打翅膀飞行的,而不是滑翔
这个结论显然需要一个假设。。因为拍打飞行需要有网状物,有网状物就一定是拍打飞行吗?这需要有一个假设,就是这个网状物一定是有用的,否则不会长
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 07:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部