|
想带着大家每天坚持读逻辑,就拿来Source为鸡精的逻辑真题,每天带着大家打卡,希望大家能坚持每天学习+逻辑打卡; 大家可以在有限时间内阅读并分析逻辑链,本帖回复结构和猜测的答案方向,可以看看谁猜的准!大家都是大侦探! 每日的答案和结构在揽瓜阁逻辑群中更新 揽瓜阁逻辑群加群方式在本文末尾 考试群: 揽瓜阁阅读精读(读什么文章,大家读过就懂了): 公众号:1.考什么试 2.商校百科 申请群 1. ChaseDream 2023 MBA 申请/校友答疑/面试群: 2.英国,新加坡,美国,法国,加拿大,香港,德国商科申请群: 3. 行业分享交流/职业规划群: 小红书: 1.留学+考试 最新消息 关注妥妥妥了 (小红书号:323014154) 2.求职+MBA 最新消息 关注元(小红书号:895404330) 朋友们!揽瓜阁逻辑小分队重新上线啦~每日材料我们仍旧会发布在ChaseDream GMAT 逻辑版块。 为了响应大家想拉群专门讨论2022揽瓜阁逻辑的要求,我们设立了小范围的打卡群(仅针对确定会打卡的同学),现作出揽瓜阁逻辑2022打卡群入群流程如下: 2.向小蓝鸡发送关键字:【揽瓜阁逻辑2022】并附上三次任务截图后耐心等待入群即可。 3. 本次小分队活动为纯公益性活动,为了督促大家学习,采取严格的打卡审查制度,连续三日不打卡的朋友会被无情清退。 ⚠️重要提醒:如您还不是GMAT交流群群友,请先申请进入GMAT交流群后再申请进入揽瓜阁逻辑2022打卡群 最新鸡麦群入口: 手机微信打开或者电脑网页打开均可,记得一定要登录再填,无需跳转APP Day 141
1. 氧气和饮料
One of the limiting factors in human physical performance is the amount of oxygen that is absorbed by the muscles from the bloodstream. Accordingly, entrepreneurs have begun selling at gymnasiums and health clubs bottles of drinking water, labeled "SuperOxY" that has extra oxygen dissolved in the water: Such water would be useless in improving physical performance, however, since the only way to get oxygen into the bloodstream so that it can be absorbed by the muscles is through the lungs.
Which of the following, if true, would serve the same function in the argument as the statement in boldface?
A. the water lost in exercising can be replaced with ordinary tap water
B. the amount of oxygen in the blood of people who are exercising is already more than the muscle cells can absorb
C. world-class athletes turn in record performances without such water
D. frequent physical exercise increases the body s ability to take in and use oxygen
E. lack of oxygen is not the only factor limiting human physical performance
2. 氮肥
F:氮肥会污染环境
P:科学家搞了个新种子,可以减少氮肥使用,并且不减少产量
C:这样做并不会减少污染
问支持
3. 乐观防止心脏病
对10,000 个 individuals 做的 survey, in eight years, people with open heart and optimistic attitude 患心脏病的几率比 pessimistic 的人低30%。由此得出,一个最佳的保持健康身体的有效方法就是保持开朗乐观。
问题:作者因为犯了啥错使得他这个观点有理由被质疑呢(put his reasoning into a skeptical place)
其中三个选项:
A. 他丫没考虑到影响心脏病发病率的其他诸多因素,该打。
B. 他丫用一段时间的事儿(就是指的那& 年咯)推到整个生命这么长时间的事儿,该打。
C. 他丫把两件同时发生的事看成是a cause-and-effect event, 但是又木有给出具体 evidence 证实这个因果关系,该打。
|