ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3691|回复: 18
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[阅读小分队] 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第173天 CO2减排

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2021-10-8 21:41:50 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
请大家在本帖回复:
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案

解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布

报名活动,加微信号killgmat

关注考什么试微信公众号~获取第一时间考试新闻,心经和经验分享


Proposed CO2 reduction schemes present large uncertainties in terms of the perceived reduction needs and the potential costs of achieving those reductions. In one sense, preference for a carbon tax or tradeable permit system depends on how one views the uncertainty of costs involved and benefits to be received.

For those confident that achieving a specific level of CO2 reduction will yield very significant benefits then a tradeable permit program may be most appropriate. CO2 emissions would be reduced to a specific level, and in the case of a tradeable permit program, the cost involved would be handled efficiently, but not controlled at a specific cost level. This efficiency occurs because control efforts are concentrated at the lowest-cost emission sources through the trading of permits.

However, if one is more uncertain about the benefits of a specific level of reduction then a carbon tax may be most appropriate. In this approach, the level of the tax effectively caps the marginal control costs that affected activities would have to pay under the reduction scheme, but the precise level of CO2 achieved is less certain. Emitters of CO2 would spend money controlling CO2 emissions up to the level of the tax. However, since the marginal cost of control among millions of emitters is not well known, the overall effect of a given tax level on CO2 emission cannot be accurately forecasted.

1. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage concerning a carbon tax?
(A) if it were tiered according to the income of each emitter, then it could be more effective than tradeable permits.
(B) implementing it for all known emitters could be cost-prohibitive.
(C) the marginal cost of control associated with such a tax will likely be affected by other pending CO2 regulations.
(D) if it were introduced at too low a level, it may not result in any significant reduction in CO2 emissions.
(E) it is generally regarded as a better option than tradeable permits by most environmentalists.

2. According to the passage, who should support a tradeable permit program?
(A) a person who is unconcerned with the effects of a new carbon tax.
(B) one who believes that CO2 emissions have already been cut to acceptable levels.
(C) a person who is uncertain that cutting CO2 emissions by a certain percentage will produce the best results.
(D) one who is more concerned with cutting the CO2 emissions of the heaviest producers.
(E) a person who believes that cutting CO2 emissions by a certain percentage will produce the best results.

3. The author would most likely agree with which of the following?
(A) the tradeable permit program offers the best overall solution to rising CO2 emissions.
(B) it is difficult to predict the long term effects of either scheme given the currently available information.
(C) the carbon tax will force major emitters to significantly reduce their CO2 emissions using economic incentives.
(D) CO2 emissions represent the most significant contributor to the greenhouse effect.
(E) other schemes under review may provide better alternatives than the tradeable permit program or the carbon tax.


参考答案:DEB

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
19#
发表于 2021-11-3 21:13:44 | 只看该作者
DEB 6:06
1、tax vs tradeble program →uncertainty
2、confident→tradeable(xspecific level)
3、uncertain→tax(not well known
18#
发表于 2021-10-28 21:08:27 | 只看该作者
P1 co2减排的两种方法,tax+排放权交易,的选择,取决于对成本收益的分析
P2 选择交易权的人,是会在减排中获得巨大收益的。——展开解释,介绍方法有效的原因
P3 选择tax的是不确定减排会带来多少收益的——tax方案的解释——提出管理费用未知,所以tax方案的总效果无法准确预测
1 C
2 E
3 B
17#
发表于 2021-10-26 11:24:44 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
DEB
1. CO2减排有很大的不确定性。提出两种方式,人们对此有不同看法。
2. 对于认为CO2减少到一定程度有益处的人来说,tradeable permit program好
3. 对于不确定减排益处的人来说,carbon tax好
16#
发表于 2021-10-19 09:08:53 | 只看该作者
DEB
15#
发表于 2021-10-18 19:50:57 | 只看该作者
根据costs和benefits的不确定性 --> tradeable permit system V.S. carbon tax
1. certain specific level of CO2 √   --> Tradeable permit system --> Efficiency: at the lowest-cost emission sources
2. uncertain  --> Carbon tax --> uncertain achievement / effect

1. D "Emitters of CO2 would spend money controlling CO2 emissions up to the level of the tax." 排放越多花钱越多
2. E " those confident that achieving a specific level of CO2 reduction will yield very significant benefits"
3. B "a.  but not controlled at a specific cost level. b. the overall effect cannot be accurately forecasted."
14#
发表于 2021-10-18 16:24:22 | 只看该作者
DEB
13#
发表于 2021-10-17 23:29:30 发自手机 Web 版 | 只看该作者
mark
12#
发表于 2021-10-17 17:11:53 | 只看该作者
DEB
11#
发表于 2021-10-15 00:01:52 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-18 21:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部