ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4587|回复: 21
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[阅读小分队] 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第155天 租借法案

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2021-9-1 07:26:49 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式

请大家在本帖回复:
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案

解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布

报名活动,加微信号killgmat

关注考什么试微信公众号~获取第一时间考试新闻,心经和经验分享





Enacted on March 11, 1941, the Lend-Lease Act authorised the United States president to provide Great Britain and its allies with weapons and military aid during World War II. In lobbying for the act, U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt compared the proposed law to lending one’s neighbor a hose to help put out a house fire, quoting: "I don't say... 'Neighbor, my garden hose cost me $15; you have to pay me $15 for it.’ I don't want $15. I want my garden hose back after the fire is over."

Many isolationist opponents of the act saw it less as a neighbourly gesture and more as a commitment to ultimately join the war, noting that it tied American finances directly to Allied success against Germany. Most historians tend to agree, but view it positively and note that it was an important turning point in a war that at the time was heavily controlled by the Germans. The act, they explain, was the only way that the American wartime industry would have been prepared to supply its own military effort when the U.S. entered the war later that year.

While the Lend-Lease Act formally ended late in 1945, its legacy lived on in the postwar aftermath and beyond. The congressional fear of increased presidential power may have come to fruition; while Congress declined to authorize the Lend-Lease products as gifts, maintaining that Britain would indeed need to pay for them, the executive branch granted discounts as high as 90% to effectively render much of the material gifts. Even so, the final debt remained unpaid until 2006, when the British, after many deferrals, made their final payment to the American government.


1. According to the passage, which of the following would likely have occurred had the Lend-Lease Act not been passed?
A Germany would have maintained control of World War II well into 1942.
B The United States would have had no financial interest in Allied success in World War II.
C The United States would not have been willing to join the Allied effort in World War II.
D American industry would have been unprepared to support the American war effort.
E Congress would not have approved another act offering to donate military supplies directly to the British.


2. The primary purpose of the passage is to:
A Criticize the isolationists who opposed the Lend-Lease Act
B Point out that the Lend-Lease Act was a positive aspect of Franklin Roosevelt’s legacy
C Discuss the cases made by both those who favored and those who opposed the Lend-Lease Act
D Provide an overview of the history of a significant piece of legislation
E Argue that the British took too long to repay their debts from World War II


3. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
A. The British were among the nations that could claim victory in World War II.
B. The passage of the Lend-Lease Act was controversial.
C. The Lend-Lease Act served as a catalyst for American industry to produce military supplies.
D. Historians believe that the Allies could not have won the war without the Lend-Lease Act.
E. The British economy was shaken enough by World War II that it could not afford to repay its Lend-Lease Act debts.


参考答案:
DDC

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
22#
发表于 2022-12-15 19:58:56 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
1.租借法案1941允许美国给英国及其盟友提供武器,罗斯福举例说这个法案只是为了恢复美国的后花园{开门见山,引出讨论对象,给予当时领导人的观点)
2.很多反对该法案的人声称罗斯福欲盖弥彰,这只是为了参战,将美国的经济与战争结果绑定,但同时也给予肯定意义,该法案为美国参战提供了军事基础,给德国增加了非常大的压力{对法案讨论,提出正反方,表明该法案存在争议)
3.法案影响深远,战后给了英国优惠,但是英国到06年才还完(法案影响,虽然确实给了英国压力,但是没说英国没能力偿还,所以第三题e不对)
21#
发表于 2021-11-12 23:17:21 | 只看该作者
ADE
最重要的一句话: The act, they explain, was the only way that the American wartime industry would have been prepared to supply its own military effort when the U.S. entered the war later that year.
法案是美国参战时,美国的战时工业唯一可以用来提供军事力量的方法。
20#
发表于 2021-11-12 13:47:45 | 只看该作者
DDC
19#
发表于 2021-11-3 21:33:25 | 只看该作者
1 C
2 D
3 C
18#
发表于 2021-10-27 18:16:47 | 只看该作者
LL ACT-在二战向英国及其盟友提供武器, 引用R为了lobby for the act
iso opponent-commitment to join the war
histotians-是US industry可以support US军事的唯一方式
尽管act结束但是UK仍要付费
DDC
文章的主要内容应该是第二部分的评价LL ACT被认为是'was the only way that the American wartime industry would have been prepared to supply its own military effort'
17#
发表于 2021-9-15 18:30:29 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
mark
16#
发表于 2021-9-14 17:36:09 | 只看该作者
BDC
15#
发表于 2021-9-14 13:48:04 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
14#
发表于 2021-9-14 11:28:19 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-18 08:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部