ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4958|回复: 26
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[阅读小分队] 揽瓜阁阅读做题小分队 第132天 科学与国界

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2021-8-9 10:32:26 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式

请大家在本帖回复:
1. 文章大概结构
2. 自己写的答案

解析+文章翻译明晚微信群里公布

报名活动,加微信号killgmat

关注考什么试微信公众号~获取第一时间考试新闻,心经和经验分享



Scientists have long claimed that, in order to flourish and progress, their discipline requires freedom from ideological and geographic boundaries, including the freedom to share new scientific knowledge with scientists throughout the world. In the twentieth century, however, increasingly close links between science and national life undermined these ideals. Although the connection facilitated large and expensive projects, such as the particle accelerator program, that would have been difficult to fund through private sources, it also channeled the direction of scientific research increasingly toward national security (military defense).

For example, scientists in the post-1917 Soviet Union found themselves in an ambiguous position. While the government encouraged and generally supported scientific research, it simultaneously imposed significant restrictions on science and scientists. A strong nationalistic emphasis on science led at times to the dismissal of all non-Russian scientific work as irrelevant to Soviet science. A 1973 article in Literatunaya Gazeta, a Soviet publication, insisted: “World science is based upon national schools, so the weakening of one or another national school inevitably leads to stagnation in the development of world science.” According to the Soviet regime, socialist science was to be consistent with, and in fact grow out of, the MarxistLeninist political ideology. Toward this end, some scientific theories or fields, such as relativity and genetics, were abolished. Where scientific work conflicted with political criteria, the work was often disrupted. During the Stalinist purges of the 1930s, many Soviet scientists simply disappeared. In the 1970s, Soviet scientists who were part of the refusenik movement lost their jobs and were barred from access to scientific resources. Nazi Germany during the 1930s and, more recently, Argentina imposed strikingly similar, though briefer, constraints on scientific research.


1. The author’s primary purpose in the passage is to:
(A) examine the events leading up to the suppression of the Soviet refusenik movement of the 1970s.
(B) define and dispel the notion of a national science as promulgated by the post-revolution Soviet regime.
(C) describe specific attempts by the modern Soviet regime to suppress scientific freedom.
(D) examine the major twentieth-century challenges to the normative assumption that science requires freedom and that it is inherently international.
(E) point out the similarities and distinctions between scientific freedom and scientific internationalism in the context of the Soviet Union.


2. Which of the following best characterizes the “ambiguous position” (Highlighted) in which Soviet scientists were placed during the decades that followed the Bolshevik Revolution?
(A) The Soviet government demanded that their research result in scientific progress, although funding was insufficient to accomplish this goal.
(B) They were exhorted to strive toward scientific advancements, while at the same time the freedoms necessary to make such advancements were restricted.
(C) While they were required to direct research entirely toward military defense, most advancements in this field were being made by non-Soviet scientists with whom the Soviet scientists were prohibited contact.
(D) They were encouraged to collaborate with Soviet colleagues but were prohibited from any discourse with scientists from other countries.
(E) The Soviet government failed to identify those areas of research that it deemed most worthwhile, but punished those scientists with whose work it was not satisfied.

3. Which of the following is most reasonably inferable from the passage’s first paragraph?
(A) Expensive research projects such as the particle-accelerator program apply technology that can also be applied toward projects relating to national security.
(B) Scientific knowledge had become so closely linked with national security that it could no longer be communicated to scientific colleagues without restriction.
(C) Without free access to new scientific knowledge, scientists in different countries are less able to communicate with one another.
(D) Governments should de-emphasize scientific projects related to military defense and emphasize instead research that can be shared freely within the international scientific community.
(E) Government funding of scientific research undermines the ideal of scientific freedom to a greater extent than private funding.

4. The author quotes an article from Literatunaya Gazeta (Lines in Bold) most probably to
(A) illustrate the general sentiment among members of the international scientific community during the time period.
(B) support the point that only those notions about science that conformed to the Marxist-Leninist ideal were sanctioned by the Soviet government.
(C) show the disparity of views within the Soviet intellectual community regarding the proper role of science.
(D) underscore the Soviet emphasis on the notion of a national science.
(E) support the author’s assertion that the Marxist-Leninist impact on Soviet scientific freedom continued through the decade of the 1970s.

参考答案:
CBBD

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
27#
发表于 2023-9-26 11:46:44 | 只看该作者
stagnation停滞

P1:科学家的自由与国家之间的矛盾
1.科学家倡导 freedom to share new scientific knowledge with scientists throughout the world
2.20世纪科学与国家的密切关系——undermined these ideals
3.原因:large and expensive projects——> national funds; direction——>national security (military defense)

P2:以Soviet Union的科学家为例
ambiguous position
——>government encourage&supported research but imposed significant restrictions
——>1. dismissal of all non-Russian scientific work
——>2. A 1973 article in Literatunaya Gazeta
——>3. socialist science = political——>证据:1930 Soviet scientists simply disappeared;1970 反对者lost their jobs and were barred
——>类比:Nazi Germany&Argentina

DBBD 10"00"
26#
发表于 2023-9-20 08:13:46 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
一、描述一個科學研究的主張
二、舉例蘇聯時期的案例作為說明

一:科學家主張需要高度自由化才能促進科研,但二十世紀時,國家因素削弱了他們的理想。雖然有一些研究被幫助了,但也因此將科研與國防事務相連結了

二:蘇聯時期,國家鼓勵科研,但又高度限制科研,科學家被限制一定得符合共產主義,很多研究因此停止,納粹德國跟阿根廷也短暫出現類似狀況

DBED
25#
发表于 2023-9-19 21:42:15 | 只看该作者
1.促进经济发展,科学要摆脱束缚,和全世界共享。科学和国家联系破坏,难私人筹资,科研方向-军事防御
2.苏联科学家模棱两可,政府促发展科学,但是又加限制。必须和马列政治一致,和政治冲突,一些研究被废除。德国和A也有类似
CBBD
24#
发表于 2023-8-8 14:08:03 | 只看该作者
科学家们一直宣称,科学无国界,无意识形态界,才能发展。
20世纪科学和政权联系日益紧密,让科学无国界更加的不可能。因为大型,昂贵的跨国项目私人可支付不起,这些项目依赖国家拨款,和国家安全,国土安全联系在一起。

栗子:1917年之后的苏维埃雄心勃勃,国家鼓励支持科研,同时却也给科研上了紧箍咒。排挤掉了很多外国科研成果。1973年LG 说,国际科学建立在各国的学校基础上,国内的学校如果变弱,就不可避免的引向科学发展的停滞。

苏联认为科学应该符合马列主义的政治意识形态。为此,一些科学理论和领域,相对论和基因都被抛弃了,凡是和政治意识形态有冲突的科学,都被中止了。1930年待斯大林清扫时期,很多科学家被消失了。70年代科学家失业,被驱逐。纳粹德国在30年代,现代阿根廷都干过这事儿。
23#
发表于 2023-8-3 10:28:15 | 只看该作者
科学与国界

P1  科学无国界的观念在二十世纪被挑战削弱
优势:facilitated large and expensive projects,
劣势:scientific research toward national security


P2  苏联是如何限制科学自由交流的
1917前:
1、无视和苏联无关的研究
2、要和马克思主义相符合,不符合的被废除
1970:因为政治运动失去工作,禁止从事科学研究
纳粹德国:
22#
发表于 2021-12-9 23:06:51 | 只看该作者
old-需要freedom
new-但是实际上不行,比如会影响national security
举例证明上面
DD-选对了又改错BA
21#
发表于 2021-11-12 20:52:39 | 只看该作者
1 B
2 B
3 B
4 D
20#
发表于 2021-8-20 21:21:47 | 只看该作者
555
19#
发表于 2021-8-20 17:44:48 | 只看该作者
DBBA
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-2 18:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部