- UID
- 1333346
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2018-3-14
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-704687-1-1.html
philosopher：有些东西没有aesthetic value，比如对我来说：blablabla junk food就没有任何审美价值。
选择E: different people have different ideas so to whether one particular things have aesthetic value.
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1275061-1-1.html
【逻辑】
1、艺术家认为艺术品必须要有美学（aesthetics）价值，因此餐具这些东西称不上是艺术品，问削弱。
我选的是有人的审美观不一样
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1275110-1-1.html
2.有人说不是所有东西都可以称之为艺术品，只有能从艺术角度进行欣赏的才叫艺术品，所以。。。举了几个不能呢个从艺术角度赏析的物品说不是艺术品，问假设前提 V1. 有一题关于哲学家定义艺术的，认为艺术必须不能怎样怎样的 。然后列举了一堆不是艺术的东西，问他的reasoning哪里有问题。我 选的是他只是说了什么不是art而没有说明什么是art。 这题JJ里貌似没有，依稀记得以前做过类似的。 By theonehl (ID: 679686) 770分 Q51V44 V2. philosopher：有些东西没有aesthetic value，比如对我来说：Blablabla junk food就没有任何审美价值。
选择E: different people have different ideas so to whether one particular things have aesthetic value. By whataboutnow (ID: 749682) 760分 答案：是他只是说了什么不是art而没有说明什么是art。
OG
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art.
Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion?
A. Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.
B. Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.
C. Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.
D. An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the objects practical utility.
E. Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.
We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work.
(B) The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.
(C) The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next.
(D) The mere fact that a work of art has endured for centuries does not establish its greatness.
(E) If critics agree about the value of a particular cotemporary work of art, then the work can objectively be called great.
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2018-7-17 08:47:23
收藏
收藏
楼主