求大N帮助，这文章实在是理解不了

Saber-leilie

Jacob Burckhardt’sview that Renaissance European women “stood on a footing of perfect equality”with Renaissance men has been repeatedly cited by feminist scholars as aprelude to their presentation of rich historical evidence of women’sinequality. In striking contrast to Burckhardt, Joan Kelly in her famous 1977essay, “Did Women Have a Renaissance?” argued that the Renaissance was a periodof economic and social decline for women relative both to Renaissance men andto medieval women. Recently, however, a significant trend among feministscholars has entailed a rejection of both Kelly’s dark vision of theRenaissance and Burckhardt’s rosy one. Many recent works by these scholars stress the ways in which differences among Renaissance women—especially interms of social status and religion—work to complicate the kinds ofgeneralizationsboth Burckhardt and Kelly made on the basis of theirobservations about upper-class Italian women

这里说最近女权主义者的观点趋势是反对kelly和Burckhardt的观点的，反对的理由是，Kelly和Burckhardt只研究上层社会的女性就得出了普遍性的结论，这是不对的，实际情况应该根据不同女性的宗教地位等来进行研究

The trend is alsoevident, however, in works focusing on those middle- and upper-class Europeanwomen whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in thehistorical record. Such women were, simply by virtue of their literacy, membersof a tiny minority of the population, so it is risky to take their descriptionsof their experiences as typical of “female experience” in any general sense.Tina Krontiris, for example, in her fascinating study of six Renaissance womenwriters, does tend at times to conflate “women” and “women writers,assumingthat women’s gender, irrespective of other social differences, includingliteracy, allows us to view women as a homogeneous social group and make thatgroup an object of analysis. Nonetheless, Krontiris makes a significant contributionto the field and is representative of those authors who offer what might becalled a cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements,although she also stresses the social obstacles Renaissance women faced whenthey sought to raise their “oppositional voices.” Krontiris is concerned toshow women intentionally negotiating some power for themselves (at least in therealm of public discourse) against potentially constraining ideologies, but inher sober and thoughtful concluding remarks, she suggests that such verbalopposition to cultural stereotypes was highly circumscribed; women seldomattacked the basic assumptions in the ideologies that oppressed them

这里说TK把女性作家和女性当做一个统一体来研究，她也没有区分不同女性的社会状况，那这不就和Kelly Burckhardt一样了么？那TK到底是支持Kelly Burckhardt的作家还是反对的？

跪谢跪谢，毕竟看完这么一大堆实在不容易。。。

tyleng

时隔多年，又看到这道题，现在看就感觉特别清晰了，简单聊一下自己的看法：
这篇文章讨论了对文艺复兴时期女性地位的学术争议，分析了从 Jacob Burckhardt 的乐观观点到 Joan Kelly 的悲观观点，再到近年来学者对这两种极端看法的重新审视与复杂化。文章还批判性地评价了 Tina Krontiris 等研究者的工作，强调了识别女性在文艺复兴时期经历的多样性与局限性的重要性。
本质上，JB和JK是两个极端，分析文艺复兴时期女性地位的角度都过于片面，这种二元化的讨论是作者批判的，而不是JB和JK没有考虑到女性政治地位或者宗教因素等原因。
所以在下面介绍TK的工作的时候，有个重要的点在于TK她是把women和women writers合并考虑了，不去细究社会地位等问题，所以TK是考虑到了文艺复兴时期女性地位的复杂性。
综合来说，作者站的是文艺复兴时期女性地位的复杂中和多样性的重要性，批判了二元化的观点，肯定了TK“谨慎乐观”的分析结果。

回过头来我们看题，E说的是，TK分析了社会地位和宗教因素，但问题是TK压根没考虑这些。但我们可以得出的结论是TK既不站JB也不站JK，所以是选D。

这篇文章最重要的是第一段最后的那个很长的一句话，它的重点在于“complicate”，如果没有抓住这个点，后面文章读来读去就会觉得矛盾或者很迷糊。

曾豆仁

传送门：http://forum.chasedream.com/foru ... B%E7%BF%BB%E8%AF%91

ruobingxu

Gracezhang- 发表于 2017-6-20 20:14
同求

这个我也不会。但是大致意思大概是，这些学者最近的著作里强调了在文艺复兴时期的女性群体内部存在的差异，尤其是社会地位和宗教信仰的不同，（这样的差异）使得B和K 这样以观察上流社会女人为基础得出的一般化结论是不够客观的。
你也可以说说你的看法

ruobingxu

E不对啊。 Tina Krontiris, for example, in her fascinating study of six Renaissance womenwriters, does tend at times to conflate “women” and “women writers,assumingthat women’s gender, irrespective of other social differences, includingliteracy, allows us to view women as a homogeneous social group and make thatgroup an object of analysis.   K没有区分女人和女作家，女作家也算是社会精英了，K并没有像E选项说的has studied Renaissance women in a wide variety of social and religious contexts
没有考虑女作家的社会地位是高于一般女性的

Gracezhang-

圆圆爱哦 发表于 2017-6-9 09:35
Many recent works by these scholars stress the ways in which differences among Renaissance women—es ...

同求

圆圆爱哦

Many recent works by these scholars stress the ways in which differences among Renaissance women—especially interms of social status and religion—work to complicate the kinds ofgeneralizationsboth Burckhardt and Kelly made on the basis of theirobservations about upper-class Italian women    这句话到底怎么理解，求大神给翻译

水沫清凉

猫樱花 发表于 2016-12-18 09:59
primary purpose
第二段的point是第一句话： The trend is alsoevident, however, in works focusing on th ...

这么久才看到回答，谢谢~~~哎，又做错一次，心痛_(:зゝ∠)_

猫樱花

primary purpose
第二段的point是第一句话： The trend is alsoevident, however, in works focusing on those middle- and upper-class Europeanwomen whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in thehistorical record.
这里的trend就是 “ a significant trend among feministscholars has entailed a rejection of both Kelly’s dark vision of theRenaissance and Burckhardt’s rosy one”

后面给的 “Tina Krontiris, for example” 是来支撑point 的， 所以他的Primarypurpose 就是 “provide an example of a writer who has rejected the views of both Burckhardt and Kelly”

vivi00

我的思路是，
第二段第一句前两个单词，"The trend"是指第一段的 “the significant trend",就是反对K和B的。Krontiris的例子是针对第二段的第一句话举例的，所以Krontiris是反对K和B的。
另外，The trend is also evident, however, 说明接下来讨论的这部分是和第一段最后一部分是并列的：“Many recent works by these scholars stress the ways in which differences among Renaissance women－especially in terms of social status and religion－work to complicate the kinds of generalizations both Burckhardt and Kelly made on the basis of their observations about upper-class Italian women.“  

所以不能选E。