放狗？为什么叫放狗？

mcwoodhill

  ok, i'll unleash my dog to thank and to depress myself. really crushed to powders

我发现我做的题目和大家很多都不一样，所以能想多少就是多少了：

writing超级简单，如果有和小弟一样写过GRE，不用写了。我的是说什么卖interactive online program。我的两个攻击点是：1. no matter how interactive a program is, it can't make a trainee trainer, simply because training requires an in-depth knowledge of what to teach. if a guy knew it already, he or she wouldn't need a training. so part of the argument just logically contradicts anohter: it is designed to train a person by assuming that person is already knowledgeable enough to train himself. this is ludicrous. 2. training new employees isn't just a simple process of teaching them skills and techniques, but more a process to adopt them into the new environment and build up their personal network. online program will deprive them of this opportunity of interacting with the experienced employees. And the argument just arbitrarily assumes that such a process as seemingly takes up some working time, is counterproductive. Actually in a long run, this familiarization and adoptation will boost productivity.

唯一问题是写不完，我还有好多想写的，没时间了。在有3分钟的时候停止了，然后想了一个漂亮的opening zinger, to brag a bit:

the pope just paid a blockbuster visit to my city a month ago, showing that some half of the world's population believe that even though the light is in their heart and the book at their desk, the guidance from above needs to passed on to them through a tutor. But a salesman of an online program definitely belongs to the other half, holding a belief that with the light in his heart and a book at hand, he can be bright anywhere only if he digs in.

IR:  没有难度，就是需要读，读很多。其中一个是个公司四个部门，一大篇，三个图。我一直以为满分12分，对一道题一分，这里大哥提醒时7分，那么有可能做错的就是一个利率的问题，都是图标，我看的不爽，没想大概猜的。


重要提醒：有休息就要休息。我当时做IR很郁闷，所以情绪不好，就没有休息，直接开干了。

Q: 第一道题还可以，然后就开始各种难，但是因为阅读变容易了，所以我还是在继续做：

p is the sum of 3 consecutive integers a b c and the product of 3 consecutive integers x y z, what is the remainder when p is divided by 5

(1) the remainder is 1 when a is divided by 5

sufficient

(2) the remainder is 1 when x is divided by 5

sufficient

D

a grass field and walking track. don't know how to draw a graphy--srrry dudes. what is tbe ratio of the track to the whole area?

the grass field is L in length and W in width while the track is like a combo of 4 quarter circles with a radius of d and two straight lines with length of L and width of d

make it simple: just the ratio of the track to the field

(1) the perimeter of the grass field is 3d

because the area of the grass field is L*W, while the area of the track is

2Ld+2Wd+pie*d^2

so the ratio is

2Ld+2Wd+pie*d^2/LW, insufficient, from L+W=3/2d we can't have LW equals to how many times as d^2

(2) whatever is 300 meters. believe me, no one uses meters so pass it. and again, we want a ratio, a specific number won't help. we need to know the ratio.

(1)(2) we need to know LW=?d^2 , no answers, so

E--possibly wrong but when I got this far, I kinda lost my stamina and was seeking help from my gut feeling

PS: interesting and needs more reading than math:

a circuit has few conjunction points: A, B, C, D, E, and the connections from one to another is listed in a table:

A-E 3

E-D 2

A-B 1

B-D 2

so how many ways from A to D given that no points will be passed twice

a picture helps a lot and the aswer is 8: 3*2+1*2

PS: a set: 0.1, 0.001, 0.0001, 0.00001, 0.000001

select two or more numbers to add them together, how many results can be yielded?

具体答案忘了

7^548/10，余数是多少，大部分好像都是7^100/100

kinda all i can still remember

结果比我想象好，我以为很完蛋，因为做的很痛苦，Q51

V: 第一个很简单：

sentence correction，具体想不起来了，但是整个句子就是一个mess，无数的modifiers: a prepositional phrase: on cold winter day, an infinitive phrase: to prevent, a participal phrase: being spread:我眼中怀疑GMAC语法自己就不好，整个考试语文水平和GRE不是一个层次的，太烂了：being spread? what is the fuck

但是最后只剩下这个being spread最legit。应该是C，把整个句子说清楚了：尽管说的很烂，真的：

on cold winter days, a truck driver

因为是司机师傅在很冷的冬天

see salt being spread

这个绝对是错的，太恶心了：if it's a state, just simply see salt spread, being is totally redundant, spread is a past participal phrase to describe the state of the salt

the truck driver sees the state

or the truck driver see the action of spreading salt

then it's an active action and being spread is awkward--way more awkward than in GMAC's own standard. correct structure should goes like: someone/whatever spreading salt

like you can't say someone is being hit, it's a fuck, someone is hitting someone and someone is HURT

the passive mode is a bullshit and proves gmac is bullshit. seriously, go back to college and learn basic literature/rhetoric knowledge.

然后是

to prevent

这个infinitive phrase modifies spread to tell its purpose

C

两个差不多的这样的句子以后，是一个超级长的阅读，但是可以读，因为有三段还是四段，分开了，说family business

认真读没问题，答案和内容都想不起来了，反正认真读就可以了

然后是三个critical reasoning，我其实想考试的是GRE（V169--still pondering what i did wrong, Q163, AWA 5.5），语文水平和这个完全不是一个层次，那个阅读非常愉快，verbal整个是一个非常愉快的事情，各种文章有各种rhetoric/literal beauty，这个完全就和在办公室写的报告一样，太次了，烂的没办法读。super dry and dull，一点文学都没有，什么啊

结果所有人都不同意我去学艺术史，被迫考这个，fuck!!!!!!

然后是三个critical reasoning，fuck gmac，能把reading写成10倍长的reasoning

这篇文章整个就是一段，我整个屏幕全部是字，比第一篇还要坏，这么长的一段话，分开好不好。nope，那就写很漂亮，和小说一样好不好，nope, 整个文章全部是很dry dull descriptions and qualifications，句子特别长，特别长，很长还有很多qualifications，读起来太痛苦了：

大概意思：

historians found documents, including tax--super important, write it down to the pad, limited in the use for the study of women status. blablablabla, all dry explanations for what results in the limit

then it makes a turn:

(a douchebag seeing things in a different way), whatever she's called, figure out such omission/limit might be helpful though

blablabla again, a brief introductions of her assumptions

1764--very important--write it down to the pad, from here the article starts to cite the douchebag's specific evidence to support her assumptions

at least from here the story could go interesting, telling a vivid story, analyzing a literal work, whatever. BUT NOPE, 又是特别无聊的举例，说是在philly，怎么怎么样，关键是

tax assessor，对matriarch of a household特别关照，很多细节，很无聊，结果全部都提问了

最后结论：反映当时的recognition of a certain part of women status: 又是很多细节，都rec哪些了

fuck it off，小弟我耐力有限，到这个时候崩溃了。后面不管对错，全部选了C，好多自己都知道错的也不想了，脑子也不同意我想了。我真的当时完全BLANK

用了大约5分钟，点了剩下的所有的C

当然悲剧了，很悲剧：V33, fuck, does it even pass the fail line? definitely way below the average

it won't appear good with such a discrepancy between v and q, the gap making the high score a fluke

cancel it immediately. the total was 690 though

thomas701

这个 狗（） 放（） 的我给满分，括号里按北美吐槽君的来填吧， lmao

belle1223

求问楼主“
a circuit has few conjunction points: A, B, C, D, E, and the connections from one to another is listed in a table:

A-E 3

E-D 2

A-B 1

B-D 2

so how many ways from A to D given that no points will be passed twice”
这道题什么意思啊……没太明白= =

Annasis

感谢分享！               

mcwoodhill

monica1315 发表于 2015-10-30 16:37
你做到的是这篇吗：
V1 By tian0119
第一篇考的是family bussiness 一共三段

是，这是我第一篇阅读。然后一篇更长，还是一段话，把我做崩溃了

CoolianLiang

感谢分享！               

ohmybabyyiran

不好意思，想问一下狗主，你说的那个sc的题c选项大概是什么？还能回忆出来吗？你那里讲解的有点多。我有点看不懂，你是说选项大概是on the winter days, the driver.... see the state being spred 吗?

monica1315

你做到的是这篇吗：
V1 By tian0119
第一篇考的是family bussiness 一共三段
第一段讲的是背景知识吧 什么18世纪。。
第二段讲的是许多fammily business做的好的家族会怎样。。
第三段。。。
（有点遗忘。。不好意思。。大概二三段有两个学者的研究。。。希望大家能从我的只言片语中找到线索~考考古~不好意思）
V2 By happysorrow
还有一篇不知道是说的啥东西，一堆生词。主要是和18世纪的Europe有关的，说当时的business都是以家族为单位吧，第一段上来，开场之后说了 kin和business的关系，kin提供资金之类的，business为kin提供就业之类的。然后第二段就讲一些学者disagree。具体观点包 括有的人认为这种家族式的经济直到19世纪才解散，（后面有出逻辑题目问削弱，我选的是家族里边都找外来的migrant做学徒apprentice）然 后引用了一段话，大概意思是说这种家族的产业dorminate了整个社会还是一个什么范围的政治、经济，这里有出题，好像是理解这句话。然后另外一个学 者也怎么同意这个观点，一句话。第三段开始又讲另一些学者disagree。。就是不同意第二段的观点吧。但是具体内容忘了。。。记得遇到了很多关于态度 的题 ，有一个选了unconfirmed
V3 By chasedreammj
很长，4题，有一个问题是以下哪个说明某人的某个观点（第二段结尾），这人说family business 1840年以前就减少了，我选了19世纪初有人请新移民而非家族人
最后一段有题，问某两个人都会同意以下哪种，选了家族生意和commercial worldview incompatible

ruby921212

。。。。。。。。。。飘过

jesuislan

lsat原题 是什么 表示没有听说过。。。。。

jtevans

感觉不好也要hang in there啊。。。。
觉得狗主好可惜阿 有时候都是简单题 做的很爽 分数也未必高的 做的过程痛苦 都是难题分数也大几率会高。。。。