- UID
- 1092222
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2015-3-4
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
100. (31888-!-item-!-188;#058&006228) (GWD 3-Q17)
Brochure: Help conserve our city’s water supply. By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.
Criticism: For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.
Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?
A. Even homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.
B. A conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.
C. A significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that do not have yards.
D. It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping.
E. Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined.
这道题答案是B,但是D为什么错?如果成年时也会感染的话,那么感染病菌的ticks不是并没有减少吗? |
|