12/23GMAT放狗 720（Q51V36）

鱼鳍公主

感受：
我是12月26日美国西海岸考的，本以为这个时间会很安全，结果听到23号换裤的时候我非常崩溃。可能上天眷顾，看到CD上面大家都说新库和8/30重合度高。抱着死马当活马医的心理我把8/30 阅读数学逻辑都看了一遍，阅读寂静特地看了两遍。一战12/3 620， 二战12/26 720成功分手，我真的超级感谢整理寂静的朋友们，所以我也来发一下，希望最近考试的朋友们可以考到理想的成绩。阅读全中，无一例外，感觉这辈子从来没有这么顺风顺水过。数学基本都中了，逻辑有一两题的样子。其实这次让我没那么紧张是因为verbal看到了很多认识的文章，导致我不用担心pace。所以就算大家没什么时间看机经，也请尽量多看一下阅读和数学吧，顿时那股劲儿就上去了。最后verbal做完了还剩三分钟。现在为大家回忆一下我碰到的题。

数学：（Q51）
直接报号了：12/23数学寂静 我中了4，7，10，17，19，21，23，24，27，31，56，58，70，80，101（51 million确定），133（E确定），140，159（－2确定），163，172. 给大家的复习建议，完整做一遍数学寂静，然后再把那些有点儿鸡贼的题标出来再做一遍。这么推荐大家做就是因为基本都中了。

Verbal：（V36）
逻辑：
2. 有一些人商量出来想让城市对车辆生产商的要求使用不同标准，这就会导致很多生产商都按照最严格stringent（确定是这个词）的标准进行生产，这项措施最终会导致生产商的成本增加。问assumption。我对我的答案不是很确定，大家参考一下：选项1，至少有城市会出台更严格的标准。选项2，很多城市都会有更严格的标准。当时纠结挺久的。

13. 浮游生物这题我非常清楚记得我在哪儿见过原题。不知道我见过的是不是第13题，但大概意思就是有个地方浮游生物都聚集在水层表面氮充足的地方，但是研究发现，有个地方即使氮充足，但是水里的铁含量不足，所以导致浮游生物还是没有那么多。政府为了提升浮游生物的含量，向水里倾倒了大量铁，但是最后还是发现生物含量没有增加。问哪个可以最好的解释这个现象。我选的是：向水表面添加了铁以后，很快就被洋流给冲走了。非常确定。

14. 维生素。和鸡精一样，有一个实验的结果是维生素可以提升记忆力。但其他五个实验的结果都不能证明维生素和提高记忆力有什么直接关系。问这可以说明什么？我选了和寂静一样的，第一个实验要么有操作有误要么有misconception。其他选项是这么说的：后五个实验的人对第一个人的实验有不同的理解，其他的记不住了抱歉。

18. 我选了和鸡精一样的。先说有一个城市通过鼓励骑自行车成功减少了污染还是什么，类比到这个城市，如果这个城市要是也鼓励骑自行车，那也能减少污染。问削弱。我选的，这个城市更潮湿，风更大。确定是潮湿和风大。

阅读：
第八篇 DNA和细菌

P1： 现在污染很严重，因为人滥用抗生素，导致antibiotic抗生素也对bacteria没用了，因为细菌 develop antibioticresistance阻力，bacteria适应了这些antibiotic。（这段没有出考题）

P2： 两个学者想要研究bacteria，他们没有去找到这些病菌, 而是采用另一种研究办法。他们的研究目的是看DNA在细菌死后是不是都能传播，是否被写进基因里gene

P3：这个博士带队做实验，到各种不同的地方取水，下水道，污水处理，干净水源如水库reservior厂什么的，最后得出结果说在那些比较脏的水里，有抗体的细菌数量是在原始无污染的水里(pristine崭新的 river)的几百倍。现在人处理水库／饮用水都是杀菌，可是杀菌并不能消除这种gene，所以这个gene就可以广泛的流传下去

题目（我就说我记得住的啊）

1. 两个学者研究的目的是（感觉也是文章目的）：两个选项中纠结很久，一个是extent开头 另一个是significance开头，其他的就是比较不靠谱的，一个是学者研究出了alllevel of bacteria，一个是provide data of all types of bacteria.我最后选择了significance，但是我不太能赞同这个选项后半段说的，请大家到时候再斟酌，但是文章确定没有任何data，真的数字的话只说到了一个污水里细菌数量是干净水里的几百倍，而且还不是具体数字。

2. 根据文章的调查结果，政府以后应该怎么样做才能更好的控制水中bacteria数量。我选了鼓励人们使用一种antibiotic，这种antibiotic在使用之后马上就自己分解。我想的是这样就不会让细菌有机会develop antibiotic resistance了。其他还有减少倾倒antibiotic量。

第九篇 污染

第一段 传统的corporate 是以identify,examine, clean up pullution waste 为主轴, 是用被动的处理方式来对待pollution 的问题; 近几年的新公司是采用prevention-method. 比如说增加newequipment 来减少排放或是采取close monitor的主动方式来处理pollution问题。但是，很多manager觉得致力于减少污染一定会增加成本，使profit下降。但是作者指出了一个新的观点，说公司可以viewpollution problems as opportunity cost - pollution problem indicatesinefficiency in resource allocation 和company 的运行模式. 公司可以把pollution 问题进一步的看成是公司运作方式出了问题的警讯。Opportunity cost就是因为污染浪费掉的资源是很多的。其实反而会更节约资源，提升利润

第二段 介绍了product defect。因为之前的质量控制也被人视为cost，公司原本认为产生defeat是不可避免的。企业总觉得产品生产的更精细是种浪费，因为要增加不必要的人力，其实他们错了，在让产品更完美的同时减少了不必要的loss，提升profit。

第三段 like the 产品质量的理论product defect，pollution也可以用opportunitycost理论来eliminate，呼吁manager改变生产过程减少污染。

题目：

opportunity cost是什么：选了possible losses if not preventpollution. 不要选stop pollution因为这不是cost只是action，我当时看寂静的时候也是很纠结，但是后来查了opportunity cost的专业定义，the loss of potential gain from otheralternatives when one alternative is chosen. 所以我选择了这个。

第二段作用：analogeous，选项没有用analogy，用了形容词

十八：姐妹书信

P1英国Sarah Scott的作品常常被误读，这可能也和人们对17世纪女性生活存在误解有关。历史学家对17世纪女性的生活状况有误解，老观点觉得，姐妹结婚以后互相联系的就少了。但是，姐妹的书信反驳了这一点：即使是sarah scott婚后，她们也联系密切，分享政治观点，参与彼此的文学创作，公用secretary，经常参加社会政治文艺生活。（两姐妹的last name不一样，因为嫁了以后就随夫姓儿了）

P2 讲了姐妹联系没有变少这件事情对社会的积极意义，这里没有考题，反正没有再提姐妹书信的事情，而是开始升华，往政治方面说了。

题目：

姐妹书信为了说明什么？说明女性婚后的联系没有变少，说明老观点是错的。

以下哪一个事情姐妹结婚后没有做：有一个选项说两人只要有一个人出席活动，另一个就一定是accompany。我没有选这个，文章只是说会参加，“只要”太绝对。

最后一篇实在记不住了对不起大家。

希望分享的这些可以帮助大家！考到自己理想的成绩！

Amy秋秋秋秋秋

感谢分享！               

Selcah

感谢分享！               

ElDorado

感谢楼主分享！

billyisfragile!

The Bluestocking Sisters: Women's Patronage, Millenium Hall, and 'The Visible Providence of a Country'
Eve Tavor Bannet
Eighteenth-Century Life
Duke University Press
Volume 30, Number 1, Winter 2006
pp. 25-55

Sarah Scott's life and opus have become separated from those of her sister, Elizabeth Montagu, by some accidents of history and ideology that have determined and partly falsified our interpretations of their work. The persistence of the notion that the sisters' lives took divergent, if not actively antagonistic, courses at or before Scott's marriage in 1751 is curious, since, even after sanitizing excisions made by early editors, Montagu's correspondence with Scott and other family members indicates not only that the sisters spent part of each year together and remained in close physical and epistolary contact throughout their lives, but also that they knew the same people, collaborated in the same philanthropic activities, shared reading matter, political positions, and a secretary, discussed each others' writings, and gave each other mutual authorial aid, as well as personal, familial, and social support.

Rereading the sisters' relationship through their discussions about patronage and lifelong cooperation in a variety of philanthropic endeavors reintegrates Sarah Scott and her opus into the Bluestocking circle, as recent collections by Nicole Pohl, Betty Schellenberg, and Gary Kelly have begun to do.2 Restoring Montagu to her place in Scott's life, and Scott t her place in Montagu's inner Bluestocking circle, changes our understanding of Scott's concept of philanthropy and of the social position from which she advocated reform. It also gives Scott's estate novels central political relevance, and makes Montagu and second-generation Bluestockings heirs to Scott's utopian vision at Millenium Hall.

The sisters also add significantly to what we know about women's patronage. It has become clear that eighteenth-century women in the upper ranks did exercise power and participate in the public sphere in a number of important but informal ways. But perhaps inevitably, given our disciplinary divisions, we have been discovering these separately. Feminist historians, such as Elaine Challus, Sarah Richardson, and Judith Lewis, have uncovered the important roles that aristocratic women played both in electoral and family politics, and as patrons or brokers in the patronage system on which all political and ecclesiastical appointments depended. Literary and cultural historians, such as Dustin Griffin and Sarah Prescott, have shown that ladies were also active participants in the literary patronage system.4Other scholars, such as Beth Fowkes Tobin, Patricia Comitini, and Dorice Williams Elliott, have traced upper- and middle-class women's ultimately successful efforts to appropriate the new managed and institutionalized forms of philanthropic activity as a "properly female" activity, while demonstrating the efficacy of fictions such as Hannah More's Coelebs in Search of a Wife.

In the middle of the eighteenth century, however, these several strands of female power and activity were not yet necessarily separate and distinct. They were interwoven, first of all, in the language. Patronage referred both to the right to dispose of government or military offices, church livings, or other employments, and to "the action of a patron in giving influential support, favor, encouragement or countenance to a person, institution, or work" (OED). In this latter sense, institutional philanthropy—the financial support of a charity school or hospital—and the support or reward of a writer figured as forms of patronage.6 Indeed, as late as 1772, booksellers were being described as writers' patrons, as was the public when authors printed by subscription or on their own account.7 These different strands of patronage were also interwoven in women's lives in sometimes unexpected ways, for a variety of conflicting motives. The Bluestocking sisters, Sarah Scott and Elizabeth Montagu, who have not been considered from this point of view either in the literature on patronage and philanthropy or in critical studies of their lives and writings, have something to teach us here.

billyisfragile!

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN
January 2007
Volume 296, Issue 1

JOURNAL ARTICLE
Pollution in Solution
CHARLES Q. CHOI
Scientific American
Vol. 296, No. 1 (JANUARY 2007), pp. 22-23
Published by: Scientific American, a division of Nature America, Inc.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26069099
Page Count: 2

StevenLuo_

感谢分享！               

Vioff

想请问下lz怎么学习数学的？？数学简直是我的心结啊网课看了还是做不好题，看寂静都觉得好看做着好累

christine_1130

感谢楼主！想弱弱的问一下 这次的逻辑机经在哪里。。