ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1222|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD7一篇阅读

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-17 17:31:00 | 只看该作者

GWD7一篇阅读

Linda Kerber argued in the mid-


       1980’s that after the American Revolution


       (1775-1783), an ideology of “republican


Line motherhood” resulted in a surge of edu-


  (5)      cational opportunities for women in the


United States.  Kerber maintained that


the leaders of the new nation wanted


women to be educated in order to raise


politically virtuous sons.  A virtuous citi-


(10)      zenry was considered essential to the


success of the country’s republican form


of government; virtue was to be instilled


not only by churches and schools, but


by families, where the mother’s role


(15)      was crucial.  Thus, according to Kerber,


motherhood became pivotal to the fate


of the republic, providing justification for


an unprecedented attention to female


education.


(20)            Introduction of the republican moth-


       erhood thesis dramatically changed


       historiography.  Prior to Kerber’s work,


educational historians barely mentioned


women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929


(25)      work is the notable exception.  Examining


newspaper advertisements for acade-


mies, Woody found that educational


opportunities increased for both girls


and boys around 1750.  ointing to “An


(30)      Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting


a shift in view, Woody also claimed that


practical education for females had


       many advocates before the Revolution.


Woody’s evidence challenges the notion


(35)     that the Revolution changed attitudes


regarding female education, although it


may have accelerated earlier trends.


Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-


      lican motherhood” thesis may have


(40)     obscured the presence of these trends,


making it difficult to determine to what


extent the Revolution really changed


women’s lives.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Q10:


According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody’s 1929 work was


              



  • innovative because it relied on newspaper advertisements as evidence

  • exceptional in that it concentrated on the period before the American Revolution

  • unusual in that it focused on educational attitudes rather than on educational practices

  • controversial in its claims regarding educational opportunities for boys

  • atypical in that it examined the education of girls

  • 答案:B。文中没有提到,只说因为他关注了妇女的教育。




    Q12:


    The passage suggests that, with regard to the history of women’s education in the United States, Kerber’s work differs from Woody’s primarily concerning which of the following?


                  



  • The extent to which women were interested in pursuing educational opportunities in the eighteenth century

  • The extent of the support for educational opportunities for girls prior to the American Revolution

  • The extent of public resistance to educational opportunities for women after the American Revolution

  • Whether attitudes toward women’s educational opportunities changed during the eighteenth century

  • Whether women needed to be educated in order to contribute to the success of a republican form of government

  • 答案:C。估计是从最后的那段话里看出来的,但是确实有点不明白其含义,尤其是"the trend"到底是啥意思?


    沙发
     楼主| 发表于 2005-8-28 07:50:00 | 只看该作者

    有人帮忙看看吗?多谢了!

    板凳
    发表于 2005-8-28 11:16:00 | 只看该作者
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-23 23:29
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部