ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4713|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep2---essay16---54请教!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-5-8 16:31:00 | 只看该作者

prep2---essay16---54请教!!

Essay #16.  563       (23692-!-item-!-188;#058&00563-00)

 

Planter-legislators of the post-Civil War southern United States enacted crop lien laws stipulating that those who advanced cash or supplies necessary to plant a crop would receive, as security, a claim, or lien, on the crop produced.  In doing so, planters, most of whom were former slaveholders, sought access to credit from merchants and control over nominally free laborers--former slaves freed by the victory of the northern Union over the southern Confederacy in the United States Civil War.  They hoped to reassure merchants that despite the emancipation of the slaves, planters would produce crops and pay debts.  Planters planned to use their supply credit to control their workers, former slaves who were without money to rent land or buy supplies. Planters imagined continuation of the pre-Civil War economic hierarchy:  merchants supplying landlords, landlords supplying laborers, and laborers producing crops from which their scant wages and planters' profits would come, allowing planters to repay advances.  Lien laws frequently had unintended consequences, however, thwarting the planter fantasy of mastery without slavery.  The newly freed workers, seeking to become self-employed tenant farmers rather than wage laborers, made direct arrangements with merchants for supplies.  Lien laws, the centerpiece of a system designed to create a dependent labor force, became the means for workers, with alternative means of supply advances, to escape that dependence.

Question #54.  563-03       (23830-!-item-!-188;#058&000563-03)

 

The passage suggests which of the following about merchants in the post-Civil War southern United States?

 

(A) They sought to preserve pre-Civil War social conditions.

(B) Their numbers in the legislatures had been diminished.

(C) Their businesses had suffered from a loss of collateral.

(D) They were willing to make business arrangements with former slaves.(是从reassure看出的吗?)

(E) Their profits had declined because planters defaulted on debts for supply advances.

E应该是不对的 merchants的profits没有下降 ,但D是怎样得出的呢???是从reassure看出来的吗?还是从哪里看出来的??望指教,不胜感激!!!

沙发
发表于 2009-5-9 08:56:00 | 只看该作者

看不懂晕!

板凳
发表于 2009-5-9 08:57:00 | 只看该作者
再回忆贴
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-10 12:00:00 | 只看该作者
我的意思是说是不是 通过 reassure这个词看出选D ,因为文章其他地方貌似没有什么clues
5#
发表于 2010-4-26 14:40:12 | 只看该作者
我也错了。。。。。They hoped to reassure merchants that despite the emancipation of the slaves, planters would produce crops and pay debts.这个they 指的是planter. 而选项里面说的former slaves不是这些人哦。。。。 The newly freed workers(就是前面的former slaves), seeking to become self-employed tenant farmers rather than wage laborers, made direct arrangements with merchants for supplies. 这里说明了那些奴隶也能从商人那里拿到credit独立自主地成为planter而不是受雇于人,所以可以看出来那些商人是愿意和他们合作的。要不然奴隶们不可能达到目的
6#
发表于 2010-8-26 17:20:29 | 只看该作者
我也错了……

后来发现应该定位倒数第二句:  The newly freed workers, seeking to become self-employed tenant farmers rather than wage laborers, made direct arrangements with merchants for supplies。

想了想,是不是因为题目既然问了post-war,也就是和pre-war形成了对比吧,那应该优先考虑however后那些unintend的内容里。自己都觉得是歪理……
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-26 14:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部