我好不容易才下定决心要两天一篇作文,多么不容易啊,各位大虾,支持一下啦谢谢(这是第三篇,但原比前两篇好一点) TWE004 It has been said, "Not everything that is learned is contained in the books." Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?
It is common sense that books do not contain everything that is learned. Knowledge gained from experience and from books is at the same status. Both these sources have their own advantages and disadvantages.
Experience plays an important role in everyone's life undoubtedly. The most important, the knowledge gained from experience is so impressive that large amounts of them can not be forgot all our life, they will come to our mind whenever needed. In fact, the vivid scene and sound make them easier to last longer in our memory than the knowledge gained from books. In addition, not all things are covered by books, we often learn precious knowledge which can not be found in books through experience and it certainly helps us a lot. Furthermore, most of the knowledge in books is gained from experience first, in another way, experience is the original source.
However, not all knowledge we learn from books is right. We sometimes draw wrong conclusions from experiences. Without leading, we can be misled by complicated phenomena.
Books, however, are well organized and systematical. They are demonstrated in more accurate ways. Knowledge in books is also more convenient to get, we can easily find the very part we want, but we can only learn from the things we already experienced. Nevertheless, knowledge gained from books still has its disadvantage as being uneasy to remember.
Based on the points stated, my conclusion is that books and experience are both important sources. Their importance is based on our necessity, when we want to learn precise knowledge systematically or can be easily found, books are our first choice, in other cases, experience play a more significant role.
|