- UID
- 394587
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2008-11-6
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Some historians contend that con- ditions in the United States during the Second World War gave rise to a Line dynamic wartime alliance between (5) trade unions and the African American community, an alliance that advanced the cause of civil rights. They con- clude that the postwar demise of this vital alliance constituted a lost oppor- (10) tunity for the civil rights movement that followed the war. Other scholars, however, have portrayed organized labor as defending all along the rela- tively privileged position of White (15) workers relative to African American workers. Clearly, these two perspec- tives are not easily reconcilable, but the historical reality is not reducible to one or the other. (20) Unions faced a choice between either maintaining the prewar status quo or promoting a more inclusive approach that sought for all members the right to participate in the internal (25) affairs of unions, access to skilled and high-paying positions within the occupational hierarchy, and protec- tion against management’s arbitrary authority in the workplace. While (30) union representatives often voiced this inclusive ideal, in practice unions far more often favored entrenched interests. The accelerating develop- ment of the civil rights movement (35) following the Second World War exacerbated the unions’ dilemma, forcing trade unionists to confront contradictions in their own practices.
The passage is primarily concerned with
- providing a context within which to evaluate opposing viewpoints about a historical phenomenon.
- identifying a flawed assumption underlying one interpretation of a historical phenomenon.
- assessing the merits and weaknesses of a controversial theory about a historical phenomenon.
- discussing the historical importance of the development of a wartime alliance.
- evaluating evidence used to support a particular interpretation of a historical phenomenon
请问:E错在哪儿了?
|
|