ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1831|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD8-Q7 答案到底是什么呀

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-12-19 14:06:22 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The system of patent-granting, which confers temporary monopolies for the exploitation of new technologies, was originally established as an incentive to the pursuit of risky new ideas. Yet studies of the most patent-conscious business of all—the semiconductor industry—suggest that firms do not necessarily become more innovative as they increase their patenting activity. Ziedonis and Hall, for example, found that investment in research and development (a reasonable proxy for innovation) did not substantially increase between 1982 and 1992, the industry’s most feverish period of patenting. Instead, semiconductor firms simply squeezed more patents out of existing research and development expenditures. Moreover, Ziedonis and Hall found that as patenting activity at semiconductor firms increased in the 1980’s, the consensus among industry employees was that the average quality of their firms’ patents declined. Though patent quality is a difficult notion to measure, the number of times a patent is cited in the technical literature is a reasonable yardstick, and citations per semiconductor patent did decline during the 1980’s. This decline in quality may be related to changes in the way semiconductor firms managed their patenting process: rather than patenting to win exclusive rights to a valuable new technology, patents were filed more for strategic purposes, to be used as bargaining chips to ward off infringement suites or as a means to block competitors’ products.

GWD-8-Q7 :

The passage is primarily concerned with discussing

A.      a study suggesting that the semiconductor industry’s approach to patenting during the period from 1982 to 1992 yielded unanticipated results

B.       a study of the semiconductor industry during the period from 1982 to 1992 that advocates certain changes in the industry’s management of the patenting process

C.      the connection between patenting and innovation in the semiconductor industry during the period from 1982 to 1992

D.      reasons that investment in research and development in the semiconductor industry did not increase significantly during the period from 1982 to 1992

E.       certain factors that made the period from 1982 to 1992 a time of intense patenting activity in the semiconductor industry

答案是A,可是我选C,C蛮对的呀,看到一个帖子下留言说Prep答案是C,迷惑,求解

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-19 20:50:34 | 只看该作者
莫有人回答,我顶!
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-19 20:52:14 | 只看该作者
我再顶!
地板
发表于 2014-6-8 19:51:14 | 只看该作者
这题我认为是选C比较好。因为标黄色的句子说了,许多关于半导体行业的研究指出,当公司增加专利活动时,创新并不会增加。然后作者举出了Z和H的研究作为一个例子。
A,B里面核心词都是A STUDY,文章作者的MAIN CONCLUSION就是标黄的句子,A STUDY FROM Z&H只是一个EVIDENCE,并不是文章主旨
5#
发表于 2014-6-28 21:42:44 | 只看该作者
I choose A,too. However, the correct answer is A.
The example of semiconductor industry shows that more patents in this industry doesn't lead to innovation(****) and shows why this happen.
So in C, the connection between innovation and patents .  We should know that there is no connection between these two. If C is the correct answer ,I think the the article show say that how patent leads to innovation.
In A , a word UNANTICIPATED is important that shows the difference between original thought and what the study show, in turn, shows the the attitude of the author(maybe). Another word: study,also important.
6#
发表于 2015-12-15 16:45:37 | 只看该作者
我怎么觉得E也很对。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-21 00:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部