ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1117|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求救! lsat-11-1-16 搜查过没有明确讨论

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-2-4 04:18:00 | 只看该作者

求救! lsat-11-1-16 搜查过没有明确讨论

lsat-11-1-16


A favored theory to explain the extinction of dinosaurs, together with many other species, has been the globally catastrophic collision of a large asteroid with the Earth. Supporting evidence is an extraterrestrial chemical element in a layer of dust found worldwide at a geological level laid down contemporaneously with the supported event. A new competing theory contends that any asteroid impact was irrelevant, because it was massive volcanic activity that caused the extinctions by putting enough dust into the atmosphere to cool the planet. The Decean region of India contains extensive volcanic flows that occurred within the same time period as the supposed asteroid impact and the extinctions.


16.   Which one of the following, if true, most of strongly indicates that the asteroid-impact theory is at least incomplete, if not false?


(A) Large concentrations of dinosaur nests with fossil eggs found in Alberta indicate that at least some species of dinosaurs congregated in large groups during some part of their lives.


(B) Dinosaur remains indicate that some species of dinosaur could have migrated in herds over wide ranges, so that they could have traveled to escape the local effects of certain catastrophes.


(C) Legends from many cultures, such as the Greek legend that Cadmus raised an army by sowing dragons’ teeth in the ground, show that various accident peoples worldwide were familiar with the fossils of dinosaurs.


(D) In the Gobi desert in China, where now only small animals can eke out an existence, fossil dinosaur skeletons 27 feet long were found in circumstances indicating that the climate there was as dry when the dinosaurs lived as it is now.


(E) The fossil record in Montano from below the layer of extraterrestrial dust shows a diminution over time in dinosaur species from 35 to 13, and dinosaur teeth found above the dust layer show a diminution in species from 13 to 5.


答案是E. 百思不得其解,请教NN!


沙发
发表于 2005-2-4 12:02:00 | 只看该作者

反面论据或它因存在型削弱.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-2-4 12:55:00 | 只看该作者

反面论据或它因存在型削弱.

论据是那一层土中含有一种地球外的化学物质以及埋有同时期的灭绝动物. 但是怎么理解埋在下面的恐龙

变小了上面的牙齿也变小了? 熊DD能详细点么?谢谢!

地板
发表于 2005-2-4 15:52:00 | 只看该作者

Simple.  Form E, you know that the extinction happened before the collision.

So, even though the collision can account for the 13 to 5, how can it explain the extinction 35 to 13. Thus, incomplete.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-10 05:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部