我彻底失去理智了

...是关于语法题,在语法版没人鸟我，很不好意思地不守规矩到这里问一下大家：

Although unhappy with the high rent her company was paying for its suburban office building,the chief executive recognized rental rates for buildings in the suburbs as far lower than it typically is for property that is
        located within the city limits.

(A) rental rates for buildings in the suburbs as far lower than it typically is for property that is located within the city limits

(B) rental rates for buildings in the suburbs as being far lower than what the rates typically charged within the city limits had been for property located there

(C) rental rates typically being charged for property located within the city limits to be far lower as they typically were within the city limits for the property there

(D) that rental rates for buildings in the suburbs were far lower than rental rates typically being charged within the city limits for property located there

(E) that rental rates for buildings in the suburbs were far lower than those typically charged for property located within the city limits 

答案是E,但是代词指代原则不是说就近原则吗？那么那个those不是应该活生生的代表suburbs....?这样E就问题了，我也会选E也明白其他选项的问题，就是不知道这里为什么可以这样指代

关于代词指代问题我一直头疼，一碰到就彻底崩溃，谁能点评下这个题,and,帮我讲解一下代词指代问题吗？

我就是那只因为代词而失去理智的疯子...

稍微豁然开朗了点,我继续研究下谢谢

非常谢谢,我刚刚听了2楼的解释后也发现了这个真理

同感。谢谢