GWD3-Q17

juliet46 · 发表于 2010-12-31 17:16:21

It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscapingthan it does to put in conventional landscaping
这句话怎么解释？

sdcar2010 · 发表于 2010-12-31 21:32:25

The cost to put in water-saving landsacping is no more than the cost to put in conventional landscaping.

lonelyorchid · 发表于 2011-1-2 18:59:48

开头it是形主
to put in water-conserving landscaping （= it） costs no more than to put in conventional landscaping（= it） costs （= does ）
节水园艺的成本并不比传统园艺高

楼上是意译了，不过倒是没改变原意

fengxueyeguiren · 发表于 2015-5-6 10:56:20

lonelyorchid 发表于 2011-1-2 18:59
开头it是形主to put in water-conserving landscaping （= it） costs no more than to put in conventiona ...

是啊，所以D选项为什么不能选啊？不是说节水园艺的成本不高么，这样不就起到了削弱作用了么？

GWD3-Q17

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()