OG12 Q104... 想请教一下我的想法对不对..求指教

yqhpsyche · 发表于 2012-2-5 11:36:04

这是原题
104. Although the discount stores in Goreville’s central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long. In the five years since the opening of Colson’s, a non-discount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Many customers of Colson’s are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened.

(B) Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been discount stores.

(C) At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.

(D) Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville’s population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades.

(E) Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson’s.

我理解原文的逻辑链是：在G这个地方有个S的discount store开了，其他的搞不过它，所以关了，但是地方不会就这么空着。为什么呢？是因为有个nondiscount的C开了，搞垮了周围的店，但是那些地方都有新店开张。
选B是因为：被C搞垮的那些店所在的地方开的新店都是discount的，如果借用到S的例子上的话，还是会被S搞垮的，所以地方还得空着，所以weaken了..

不知道这样想对不对，希望各位不吝赐教

MUYU · 发表于 2012-2-5 12:18:34

http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-612620-1-1.html?SearchText=OG12 104

I found this one. Hope it helps.

AndyQ · 发表于 2012-2-23 20:19:59

（1）我把我的想法说下吧这道题很特别他把我们要削弱的结论放在了前面打破了我们的惯性思维而给出的原因是在后面这是这道题的结构
（2）结论：虽然S（discount）开了导致其他关门了（注意其他也是discount）但是这个地区关门的地方不会一直空着。
（3）原因：因为C（nondiscount）导致其他店关门了但其他店就开了。（注意这里没有说其他店是什么店）
（4）削弱结论就是：它会空着 s还会导致其他关门
（5）B选项其他店是discount店因为s打败的是discount店所以他还能打败削弱了
所以我认为楼主理解是对的或者咱俩都错了嘿嘿

colinfan · 发表于 2012-8-5 17:15:16

C店就是奢侈品航母店
S店就是奥特莱斯

5年前，C店拍死了所有卖 LV, CARTIER 这样非折扣的小小店，导致这些店面关门大吉；然后很多的山寨小店登场，直到今天的奥特莱斯开张之后，这些山寨小店在5年之后也会被竞争淘汰掉

削弱：这些山寨小店的店面将会一直空着，因为没人能竞争的过卖高档的奢侈品航母店和打折厉害的奥特莱斯

Refresh_ · 发表于 2013-8-14 16:46:12

一个语法上的问题请问in the five years 是指的过去五年吗因为我一开始就理解成了在后面的5年里

OG12 Q104... 想请教一下我的想法对不对..求指教

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()