ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Two computer companies, Garnet and Renco, each pay Salcor to provide health insurance for their employees. Because early treatment of high cholesterol can prevent strokes that would otherwise occur several years later, Salcor encourages Garnet employees to have their cholesterol levels tested and to obtain early treatment for high cholesterol. Renco employees generally remain with Renco only for a few years, however. Therefore, Salcor lacks any financial incentive to provide similar encouragement to Renco employees.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2538|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助,这道题开始让我愤恨我的大脑了,为什么怎么都想不通

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-28 14:27:29 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
101.    (31700-!-item-!-188;#058&006145)    (GWD 3-Q38)

Two computer companies, Garnet and Renco, each pay Salcor to provide health insurance for their employees.  Because early treatment of high cholesterol can prevent strokes that would otherwise occur several years later, Salcor encourages Garnet employees to have their cholesterol levels tested and to obtain early treatment for high cholesterol.  Renco employees generally remain with Renco only for a few years, however.  Therefore, Salcor lacks any financial incentive to provide similar encouragement to Renco employees.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Early treatment of high cholesterol does not eliminate the possibility of a stroke later in life.
B. People often obtain early treatment for high cholesterol on their own.
C. Garnet hires a significant number of former employees of Renco.
D. Renco and Garnet have approximately the same number of employees.
E. Renco employees are not, on average, significantly younger than Garnet employees.

当我看到答案是C的时候我完全找不到逻辑,看了好多的帖子的解释是因为C这样能多赚一份钱。。。实在不懂啊,我觉得自己有点钻了牛角尖,谁能把我揪出来喔~~~~~~~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-11-28 18:43:46 | 只看该作者
原文是说保险公司由于上面的原因缺乏financial incentive去让R公司的员工做同样的检查。那么保险公司的financial incentive是什么呢?无疑就是减少保费赔付的开支。

而c选项说明R公司的员工最后大多会去G公司,也就是说如果员工在R公司的时候没有检查出早期的病症,那么很可能到了G公司会发病,而此时保险公司需要赔付大量的医疗开支,这与保险公司的目的是相悖的。

也即是,c选项带出了他因,所以weaken。
板凳
发表于 2012-11-29 06:44:48 | 只看该作者
结论:保险公司S没有经济上的刺激对于R的员工给出类似的建议。

weeken题的正确答案一定是削弱【结论】,你把上面5个选项都用POE过一遍,只能剩下C。

整个过程就是:

G和R有一个共同的保险公司S。高的C会在【多年后】引发中风,但是可以通过早期检查治疗而预防。S公司鼓励G公司员工通过早期检查治疗来预防中风。但是R的员工最多只在R公司工作个几年(潜台词:尽管可能有高的C,但是还没等到【多年后】引发中风,这些人已经离开R公司了,所以中风也不用赔了有木有)。因此保险公司S没有经济上的刺激对于R的员工给出类似的建议(即早期检查治疗)。

C选项表示,R公司这些员工后来去G公司了。这一坑爹的结论表明,S如果不让这些原来在R的员工进行早期检测治疗,那么这些人将来到了G再中风,S还是要赔钱。

我个人认为这里说的financial incentive 不一定是“赚钱”吧。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-29 15:02:27 | 只看该作者
我第一遍看完选项就把所有选项全部排除了。。。现在貌似有点懂了,谢谢诶
5#
发表于 2013-8-8 22:06:35 | 只看该作者
其实根本就不是赚钱,是减少保费损失
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 14:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部