ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 940|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

不懂

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-6-4 08:48:47 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal government has placed on industry poses more serious hardships for big business than for small ones.Since large companies do everything on a more massive scale, they must altermore complex operations and spend much more money to meet government requirements.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?   
(A) Small companies areless likely than large companies to have the capital reserve for improvements.
(B) The operations of small companies frequently rely on the same technologiesas the operations of large companies.
(C) Safety regulation codes are uniform, established without reference to sizeof company.
(D) Large companiestypically have more of their profits invested in other business than do smallcompanies.
(E) Large companies are in general more likely than small companies todiversity the markets and products.
答案A, DE为何不对?


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-6-4 09:14:28 | 只看该作者
up~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
板凳
发表于 2013-6-4 10:20:53 | 只看该作者
该题要寻找能够削弱“政府提高安全标准之后,大厂比小厂要改动设备多花钱”的言论,答案的方向如下
如果要大厂比小厂少花钱,那么大厂就算安全标准提高后也不需要改动不需要花钱,那么唯一可能性就是“现有设备已经满足新的标准”A符合
D讲的是利润,与改造无关
E讲的是产品和市场,同样与改造无关
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2013-6-4 14:07:25 | 只看该作者
maestri 发表于 2013-6-4 10:20
该题要寻找能够削弱“政府提高安全标准之后,大厂比小厂要改动设备多花钱”的言论,答案的方向如下
如果要 ...

谢谢,我当时就是太主观了,认为D中利润高了,改造就好了。认为E中产品市场好了,改造就好了。忽视了DE out of scope ...  many thanks
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-7 02:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部