- UID
- 287985
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2007-10-28
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
54.
Tanco, aleather manufacturer, useslarge quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental
regulations have significantly increased thecost of disposing of saltwater that results fromthisuse, and, in
consequence, Tanco isconsidering aplanto usepotassium chloridein placeof common salt. Research has
shownthat Tanco could reprocesstheby-product of potassium chlorideuseto yield acropfertilizer, leaving a
relatively small volumeof waste for disposal.
Indeterminingtheimpact oncompany profitsof usingpotassiumchloride inplace of common salt, it would be
important for Tanco to researchall of thefollowing EXCEPT:
(Al
What difference, if any, isthere between thecost of thecommon salt needed to preserveagiven quantity
of animal hides and thecost of thepotassium chloride needed to preservethesame quantity of hides?
(8)
To whatextentistheequipment involved inpreserving animal hides usingcommon salt suitable for
preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
(C)
What environmental regulations, if any, constrainthedisposal ofthewastegenerated inreprocessing the
by-productof potassium chloride?
(0)
How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemblethat which
results when potassium chloride is used?
(E)
Are the chemical propertiesthat make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides
thesameasthose that make common salt an effectivemeans for doing so?
正确答案是E
不明白的是为啥chemical properties能否使potassium chloride和salt一样有效不影响公司的profit?
|
|