- UID
- 862678
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-3-4
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Cottrell is, at best, able to write magazine articles of average quality. The most compelling piece of evidence for this are those few of the numerous articles submitted by Cotrell that are superior, since Cotrell, who is incapable of writing an article that is better than average, must obviously have plagiarized superior ones.
The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?
(A) It simply ignores the existence of potential counterevidence.
(B) It generalizes from atypical occurrences.
(C) It presupposes what it seeks to establish
(D) It relies on the judgement of experts in a matter to which their expertise is irrelevant
(E) It infers limits on ability from a few isolated lapses in performance
正确答案是C 说是circular reasoning, 确实有道理。但是A为什么不对?如果把“must obviously have plagiarized superior ones”作为结论A应该是对的嘛。望高人回复!谢! |
|