ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3007|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

boldface一道题~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-1-23 18:22:51 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage.Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones.Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.

(B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.

(C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.

(D) The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.

(E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.
答案C我可以理解了啊,但是不太明白C中的prediction指的是什么,是Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. 这个结论吗?黑脸题中,prediction就是conclusion吗??
求解!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-1-23 18:23:27 | 只看该作者
weigh against是权衡的意思吗?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-1-24 13:58:05 | 只看该作者
木有人来回答嘛呜呜
地板
发表于 2013-2-21 21:10:35 | 只看该作者
prediction是这句话Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer.
Ron对这个题目的解释是。第二个黑体是对文章结论的削弱。
文章的结论是:Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer.
这是原帖。不明白的话可以看看
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/plant-scientists-have-used-genetic-engineering-on-seeds-t2270.html
5#
发表于 2013-2-23 11:38:42 | 只看该作者
Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage.Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones.Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.

(B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.

(C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.

(D) The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.

(E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.
答案C我可以理解了啊,但是不太明白C中的prediction指的是什么,是Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. 这个结论吗?黑脸题中,prediction就是conclusion吗??
求解!!
-- by 会员 stellalights (2013/1/23 18:22:51)



C : The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome;
the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction .


你说的没错,这个prediction就是Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer.


仔细读选项可以看出来。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-14 19:03:12 | 只看该作者
再回过头来看这道题, 我怎么突然觉得conclusion是最后一句了呢。 试想啊,读完这段文字,你得出的结论是什么? 那肯定是 最后一句话的内容啊。不见得你读完了这段话,得出的结论是thus后面的内容吧。。。。


求助啊!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-21 05:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部