ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: E

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2362|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

真題一道

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-5 10:39:00 | 只看该作者

真題一道

Q2:


Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to


ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and


unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by


growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing


the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment


over the next five years.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?


A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints


and plastics.


B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.


C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.


D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew


processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.


E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in


Kernland off their land and into the cities.

沙发
发表于 2004-12-5 16:14:00 | 只看该作者
I will choose E.
板凳
发表于 2004-12-5 18:22:00 | 只看该作者

E, too

地板
发表于 2004-12-6 00:01:00 | 只看该作者

答案为E

第一点, farmers不算在城市失业人群中;

第二点, 很多农民不种这种dd, 导致价格升高,利润增加, 从而使得位于城市中的plants不会倒闭, 从而增加就业率; 削弱不需要充分性,虽然可以举出很多个因素进行反对;

5#
发表于 2004-12-6 00:04:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Springfield在2004-12-6 0:01:00的发言:

答案为E


第一点, farmers不算在城市失业人群中;这仅仅是中国的算法,美国不是


第二点, 很多农民不种这种dd, 导致价格升高,利润增加, 从而使得位于城市中的plants不会倒闭, 从而增加就业率; 削弱不需要充分性,虽然可以举出很多个因素进行反对;



6#
发表于 2004-12-6 01:57:00 | 只看该作者
不知哪裡看過,我記得答案是E
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-6 15:30:00 | 只看该作者

thank you!!! I see.


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-6 15:31:47编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 10:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部