- UID
- 402035
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2008-12-4
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
楼主,巧用google:
1.http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/arithmetic-mean-and-standard-deviation-t13232.html take the standard deviation given (4) multiplied by the number of standard deviations the problem is interested in (1.5). In this case we get 6. Add and subtract that to the mean of 46; we get -1.5 standard deviations at 40 and +1.5 standard deviations at 52.
2.http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/for-how-many-integers-n-is-2-n-n-2-t5030.html 2 and 4. hopefully, 2 jumped out at you pretty fast; if n = 2, then the two sides of the equation are 2^2 and 2^2. i'm pretty sure that those are going to be equal. you'll discover n = 4 through raw experimentation; there isn't any better way, unfortunately.
if you want to be confident that these are the only solutions, you have to watch the behavior of 2^n and n^2 as you get further and further away from 4. the pattern you'll observe is that 2^n begins to grow much, much faster than does n^2, making it clear that the two expressions won't be equal for any larger values. the equality is definitely impossible for negative integers, because 2^(negative integer) is a fraction, while (negative integer)^2 is not. therefore, you don't have to worry about negative integers. |
|