ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

Twenty percent of the stores in Morganville's downtown shopping district will fail within five years because they will be competing directly with the SaveMart discount department store newly opened in East Morganville. The downtown shopping district has lost business at this rate before and has always completely rebounded. Confidence that it will rebound again from the losses it is now about to suffer is ill founded, however, because __________.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2423|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新prep cr1 77

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-9 15:15:00 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
77.(30754-!-item-!-188;#058&005525)



Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

Twenty percent of the stores in Morganville's downtown shopping district will fail within five years because they will be competing directly with the SaveMart discount department store newly opened in East Morganville.  The downtown shopping district has lost business at this rate before and has always completely rebounded.  Confidence that it will rebound again from the losses it is now about to suffer is ill founded, however, because __________.

A. the stores likely to be put out of business by direct competition from SaveMart are the downtown shopping district's anchor stores, on whose ability to draw shoppers many of the other downtown stores depend

B. the bus line that has long connected the downtown area of Morganville with East Morganville has a tradition of carrying shoppers who reside in East Morganville into downtown Morganville to shop

C. when the downtown shopping district has rebounded before, the business premises of a failed business were typically taken over by a business of the same kind as had been there before

D. SaveMart's business plan for the East Morganville store is based on earning low profits, if any, during the first five years of the store's existence

E. it is conceivable that the downtown shopping district could shrink substantially without collapsing altogether


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-9 15:17:50 | 只看该作者
答案:A

E:我选的这个选项,说这些市区的商店在没有彻底完蛋的情况下大幅度缩水
   1、这个不能解释为什么今年不能rebound吗?
   2、很多人说这个是削弱了,但是文章的结论是这些以前可以rebound的商店今年不能rebound了,这个选项不正好加强吗
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-10 15:35:32 | 只看该作者
求各位NN解答哇~~
地板
发表于 2012-11-16 11:07:47 | 只看该作者
E项的话,只是单单说明了district可以在没有完全垮掉的情况下缩减一些,但是这样的话有可能是因为district有一定的缓冲能力,以至于将来还会REBOUND。我觉得这项对原文结论的成立有可能起到削弱的作用,或者无关,相比较之下,A项更加的能说明问题。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-13 08:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部