- UID
- 1105930
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2015-4-14
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Advertisement: Ten years ago, the Cormond Hotel's lobby was carpeted with Duratex carpet
while the lobby of a nearby hotel was being carpeted with our competitor's most durable
carpet. Today, after a decade in which the two hotels have had similar amounts of foot traffic
through their lobbies, that other hotel is having to replacethe worn-out carpeting near its lobby
entrances, whereas the Cormond's Duratex carpeting has years of wear left in it.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the force of the advertisement's evidence
for concluding that Duratex carpet is more durable than the carpet of its competitor?
显然是 C 旅馆和 other 旅馆的类比。相似点，near，foot traffic 相同。 问削弱，
找选项：CQ1 两种旅馆的不同点。
A. The lobby of the Cormond Hotel has five different entrances, but the lobby
of the other hotel has only two. （显然可以，门不一样。）
B. The carpet of the Cormond Hotel's lobby is not the most durable carpet that Duratex
manufactures.（没有提到 other hotel）
C. The other hotel has a popular restaurant that can be reached from outside without walking
through the hotel lobby.（没有提到 C hotel）
D. The carpet that is being used to replace carpeting near the other hotel's lobby entrances is not
Duratex carpet.（没有提到 C hotel）
E. There is a third hotel near the other two that has not replaced the Duratex carpet in its lobby
for more than 15 years. （这是一个正案例，可以加强。如果把这里面的 Duratex 换成另外一
个牌子的，就是一个反案例。不过如果题目出成这样，A 选项就绝对不会存在。）
我用的是helr的方法 类比推理
本句weaken的 是一个比另一个好
但helr分析 是只要找到两个案例的一个不同点就是对原文的wenken了
用证明 不相似的方法 其实不是加强了结论吗！
你们懂我什么意思吗！！！！
苦恼了两天了 ！！
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2015-10-14 20:15:11
收藏
收藏
楼主