ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1201|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

TS9-9-12主题题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-5-5 20:37:00 | 只看该作者

TS9-9-12主题题

Ecoefficiency (measures


to minimize environmental


impact through the reduction


Line             or elimination of waste from


(5)          production processes) has


become a goal for companies


worldwide, with many realizing


significant cost savings from


such innovations. Peter Senge


(10)             and Goran Carstedt see this


development as laudable but


suggest that simply adopting


ecoefficiency innovations could


actually worsen environmental


(15)             stresses in the future. Such


innovations reduce production


waste but do not alter the num-


ber of products manufactured


nor the waste generated from


(20)             their use and discard; indeed,


most companies invest in eco-


efficiency improvements in


order to increase profits and


growth. Moreover, there is


(25)             no guarantee that increased


economic growth from eco-


efficiency will come in similarly


ecoefficient ways, since in


today’s global markets,


(30)             greater profits may be turned


into investment capital that


could easily be reinvested


in old-style eco-inefficient


industries. Even a vastly


(35)             more ecoefficient industrial


system could, were it to grow


much larger, generate more


total waste and destroy more


habitat and species than would


(40)             a smaller, less ecoefficient


economy. Senge and Carstedt


argue that to preserve the


global environment and sustain


economic growth, businesses


(45)             must develop a new systemic


approach that reduces total


material use and total accu-


mulated waste. Focusing


exclusively on ecoefficiency,


(50)             which offers a compelling


business case according


to established thinking, may


distract companies from


pursuing radically different


(55)             products and business


models.



T-9-Q9


The primary purpose of the passage is to



  • explain why a particular business strategy has been less successful than was once anticipated

  • propose an alternative to a particular business strategy that has inadvertently caused ecological damage

  • present a concern about the possible consequences of pursuing a particular business strategy

  • make a case for applying a particular business strategy on a larger scale than is currently practiced

  • suggest several possible outcomes of companies’ failure to understand the economic impact of a particular business strategy

  • 答案C.我选A. 对于C还是不能理解.我觉得这个文章的架构: 生态效率通常被认为可以节约成本. 但是PS,GC两个人认为只是采取这个措施会加重环境压力. 从两个方面来解释原因. 1.并不会减少生产所带来的污染.2.Moreover,从ecoefficient中得到的利益不一定会投入到同样的产业中.



    我觉得这篇文章主要是先提出观点. 然后论述原因.类似结论解释型. A的explain用的正好. was once anticipated代表老观点(认为生态效率可以节约成本)



    C:我觉得重点不在于论述后果啊.而在于解释..



    请指教.

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-6 06:58
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部