og 一个选项看不懂啊。。。

wbw414 · 发表于 2012-7-4 17:40:09

86. Keith: Compliance with new government regulations
requiring the installation of smoke alarms and
sprinkler systems in all theaters and arenas will cost
the entertainment industry $25 billion annually.
Consequently, jobs will be lost and profits diminished.
Therefore, these regulations will harm the country's
economy.
Laura: The $25 billion spent by some businesses will
be revenue for others. Jobs and profits will be gained
as well as lost.
Laura responds to Keith by
(A) demonstrating that Keith's conclusion is
based on evidence that is not relevant to the
issue at hand
(B) challenging the plausibility of the evidence that
serves as the basis for Keith's argument
(C) suggesting that Keith's argument overlooks a
mitigating consequence
(D) reinforcing Keith's conclusion by supplying a
complementary interpretation of the evidence
Keith cites
(E) agreeing with the main conclusion of Keith's
argument but construing that conclusion as
grounds for optimism rather than for pessimism

这道题选c，可是我不明白什么是mitigating concequence,减轻的结果？我也没查到相关的用法，不明白这种表达方式啊，各位帮帮我分析下mitigating concequence是什么意思吧，3q！！！

susielei · 发表于 2012-7-5 14:56:57

楼主，可以参考一下这个帖子
http://forum.chasedream.com/archiver/GMAT_CR/thread-171702-1.html

wbw414 · 发表于 2012-7-5 15:57:09

3Q，帖子看过了，现在明白了，非常开心

og 一个选项看不懂啊。。。

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()