ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Which of the following, if true, would cast the most doubt on the effectiveness of the authority's plan to finance the proposed improvements by increasing bridge tolls?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3586|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep07-55题,求解释。急急急!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-7-29 11:27:22 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically.The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves.Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Which of the following, if true, would cast the most doubt on the effectiveness of the authority's plan to finance the proposed improvements by increasing bridge tolls?

(A) Before the authority increases tolls on any of the area bridges, it is required by law to hold public hearings at which objections to the proposed increase can be raised.


(B) Whenever bridge tolls are increased, the authority must pay a private contractor to adjust the automated toll-collecting machines.


(C) Between the time a proposed toll increase is announced and the time the increase is actually put into effect, many commuters buy more tokens than usual to postpone the effects of the increase.


(D) When tolls were last increased on the two bridges in question, almost 20 percent of the regular commuter traffic switched to a slightly longer alternative route that has since been improved.


(E) The chairman of the authority is a member of the Tristate Automobile Club that has registered strong opposition to the proposed toll
答案选的是D,我虽然误打正着的也选了D,但是现在想想还是不明白。
题目不是说改进rail line会增加乘客的人数,所以政府想通过对rail line旁边的highway bridge的车辆收费来帮助改进rail line。
问题是哪个选项会影响政府的这个计划的有效性。
政府想通过收费来募集资金改进rail line。
D选项是说,政府收费后,通过highway bridge上的车减少了20%,所以会影响政府收取的费用。因此会影响政府的有效性。
这个是正常的理解吧

可是我的理解是,政府收费后,rail line 上的commuter减少了20%,去乘坐那些已经改进好的线路。这个看起来也合适啊,要不然D选项最后部分alternative route that has since been improved.为什么还要说that has since been improved。那这样看来这个commuter不就是rail line上的commuter吗?

可是为什么所有的解释都是说减少的是highway bridge上的drivers呢?
纠结死我了!!估计都没有人为这种问题纠结!!求解释啊!谢谢各位了!!

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-7-29 15:45:00 | 只看该作者
upup
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-7-30 11:06:29 | 只看该作者
唉,怎么没人来解答呢?难道我表述不清楚了?
地板
发表于 2012-7-30 22:34:21 | 只看该作者
理解错误,编辑
5#
发表于 2012-7-30 23:23:23 | 只看该作者
问题问的是   authority's plan  的有效性 会被哪个选项最大影响


20%司机不从这条路走。哪个 authority's plan 去收集钱就落空了

感觉材料最后一句话【Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.】跟问题关系不大。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-7-31 19:37:00 | 只看该作者
我当时看到题目也是这么想的,但是看到大家的讨论都是说政府这样做的话没有效果,好像反对政府的计划。如果按你的这种解释是支持政府的这个措施,这个好像也能说过去。不知道到底是哪一种。。。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-7-31 19:40:43 | 只看该作者
楼主理解错了哦,再看看题目。

According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically.The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves.


Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

尤其是上面那一段,很清楚说明了这个人为啥反对这个计划。因为他认为这对这些司机来说不公平,他们要多出钱,但是却没有享受到任何直接利益。

那么这就很明显了,你要推翻这个人的主张,就要证明,其实司机享受到了利益。那么下列哪项证明他享受到了利益呢,很明显就是D啦。为啥咧?你看以前实施同样的计划,道路上就有20%的司机去了别的地方,然后道路就没有那么拥挤啦,那么对这些交了钱的司机来说,其实他们就是享受了道路没那么拥挤这个benefit,所以是作者主张错误,耶。
-- by 会员 pinkking (2012/7/30 22:34:21)



我又看了下,还是不对哦。题目中问的是削弱政府计划的有效性啊,应该还是像我说的那种削弱
8#
发表于 2012-8-2 17:50:28 | 只看该作者
我重新看了一下,应该如同4楼所说的。

Responding to a pm:

The plan is to finance the improvements by increasing the toll on 2 highway bridges. What casts doubt on the plan?
The plan will be in trouble if the increase does not lead to increased collection.

Option (C) says that commuters can 'postpone' the effects of the increase. So it may take a little longer to get in the increased collection but you probably will see the increase.

Option (D) says that commuters switch to another route when toll is increased. So the overall collection may be actually less than before. This certainly casts doubt on the plan.
9#
发表于 2012-12-7 10:19:04 | 只看该作者
哎,我一开始觉得D 中20%太少了,不是起主要作用,就排除了~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-7-4 17:40
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部