ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1979|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep08的两道逻辑题,求讨论,谢谢各位了~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-4-29 16:47:08 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
98.(32682-!-item-!-188;#058&006783)(GWD 28-Q29)


Early in the twentieth century, Lake
Konfa
became very polluted.Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake’s waters have become cleaner.Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again.However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.
The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

A. Apart from development related to the pipeline, there will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.

B. There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective when installed in the pipeline in Lake Konfa.

C. The bottom of the lake does not contain toxic remnants of earlier pollution that will be stirred into the water by pipeline construction.

D. Damage to the lake’s fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would cause.

E. The species of fish that are present in Lake Konfa
now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.
正确选项是C 为什么B不对呢

101.(31700-!-item-!-188;#058&006145)(GWD 3-Q38/prep 2-6 different type)



Two computer companies, Garnet and Renco, each pay Salcor to provide health insurance for their employees.Because early treatment of high cholesterol can prevent strokes that would otherwise occur several years later, Salcor encourages Garnet employees to have their cholesterol levels tested and to obtain early treatment for high cholesterol.Renco employees generally remain with Renco only for a few years, however. Therefore, Salcor lacks any financial incentive to provide similar encouragement to Renco employees.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Early treatment of high cholesterol does not eliminate the possibility of a stroke later in life.

B. People often obtain early treatment for high cholesterol on their own.

C. Garnet hires a significant number of former employees of Renco.

D. Renco and Garnet have approximately the same number of employees.

E. Renco employees are not, on average, significantly younger than Garnet employees.

正确选项是c,勉强可以理解, 那B为什么不对呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-29 23:18:50 | 只看该作者
大家随便说说也好啊,重在交流啊~~  马上要考试了,顶贴求指教~~谢谢谢谢各位了~
板凳
发表于 2012-4-30 03:12:43 | 只看该作者
第一题我的理解是原文说了既然a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.  就当他是事实。 那就没必要再考虑leaking during the installaltion 还是after installation了?
第二题求大神分析、 我觉得可能这句话中“Renco employees generally remain with Renco only for a few years”  和结论中的“financial incentive ” 理解有歧义造成 不过又不知道到底该怎么理解
我觉得B选项 不是weak 反而加强了结论  既然People often obtain early treatment for high cholesterol on their own,那更应该去做检查。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-14 02:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部