ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2442|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一道逻辑真题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-12-10 03:37:00 | 只看该作者

请教一道逻辑真题

Although the discount stores in Goreville’s central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long.  In the five years since the opening of Colson’s, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s.



Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?




  • Many customers of Colson’s are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened.

  • Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been discount stores.

  • At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.

  • Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville’s population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades.

  • Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson’s.

  • 不太明白作者的意图是什么?

    沙发
    发表于 2005-12-10 10:12:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用sunnybest在2005-12-10 3:37:00的发言:

    Although the discount stores in Goreville’s central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long.  In the five years since the opening of Colson’s, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s.




    Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?




    1. Many customers of Colson’s are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened. 跟顾客无关

    2. Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been discount stores.

    3. At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.跟现在无关,讲的是5年内

    4. Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville’s population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades.

    5. 速度无关

    6. Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson’s.产品没有关系

    不太明白作者的意图是什么?难道是B,意思:C店开了表明G店开了,导致discounting店关了?但是新开的点全是discounting的,不是nondiscount的,就跟原题目冲突。所以错了?


    但是原来题目的结论是 those locations will not stay vacant for long。


    答案应该是weaken这个才对,是不是??


    请牛牛指点啊


    我也不大懂这题目,只好用排除碰运气。逻辑怎么这么难,很多次都感觉自己知道点规律了,但是下一次做的时候,总是新题难题。我好笨哦

    板凳
    发表于 2005-12-10 15:26:00 | 只看该作者

    神啊,我发现自已越来越差了,怎么搞的这GMAT会越复习越差


    难道是我做错了什么事吗,请宽恕我吧

    地板
    发表于 2005-12-10 15:49:00 | 只看该作者

    选B吧。


    题目的结论是those locations will not stay vacant for long,即还会有新店开张。题目的理由是a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s,即以前有过一个先例Colson's,虽然有店因为竞争不过关门了,但是总有新店开张。问如何削弱?


    要削弱,就是要想办法让原题的理由无法证明它的结论,在这里就要想办法找到Colson's和SpendLess不同的地方,使的两者无法类比。


    B说Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been discount stores.即竞争不过Colson's而重开的店越来越多的是折扣店。而Colson's和SpendLess的本质区别就是前者是非折扣店,后者是折扣店。竞争不过非折扣店Colson's的都改成折扣店了,而现在开的一家极具竞争力的SpendLess已经是折扣店了,竞争不过而倒闭的店要再怎么重开法?原文的理由自然就站不住脚了。

    5#
     楼主| 发表于 2005-12-11 12:08:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用jjll在2005-12-10 15:49:00的发言:

    选B吧。


    题目的结论是those locations will not stay vacant for long,即还会有新店开张。题目的理由是a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s,即以前有过一个先例Colson's,虽然有店因为竞争不过关门了,但是总有新店开张。问如何削弱?


    要削弱,就是要想办法让原题的理由无法证明它的结论,在这里就要想办法找到Colson's和SpendLess不同的地方,使的两者无法类比。


    B说Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been discount stores.即竞争不过Colson's而重开的店越来越多的是折扣店。而Colson's和SpendLess的本质区别就是前者是非折扣店,后者是折扣店。竞争不过非折扣店Colson's的都改成折扣店了,而现在开的一家极具竞争力的SpendLess已经是折扣店了,竞争不过而倒闭的店要再怎么重开法?原文的理由自然就站不住脚了。




    看了jjll的回复我才明白这题到底是怎么回事!

    6#
    发表于 2005-12-11 21:43:00 | 只看该作者


    看了jjll的解題才明白問題所在


    7#
    发表于 2005-12-11 23:19:00 | 只看该作者
    我也是这样想得,好歹可以和大家引证一下。欣慰呀。
    8#
    发表于 2013-8-31 18:54:50 | 只看该作者
    jjll 发表于 2005-12-10 15:49
    选B吧。题目的结论是those locations will not stay vacant for long,即还会有新店开张。题目的理由是a ne ...

    我又要钻牛角尖了,您的说法我都认同, 但是,本题的conclusion是those locations will not stay vacant for long, 所以竞争不过的discount店没法重开的话可以开其他性质的店啊,因为结论只是说场地不会空,没说一定会有同性质的店来重开啊。。。。。纠结啊。。。。
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 00:41
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部