选B吧。
题目的结论是those locations will not stay vacant for long,即还会有新店开张。题目的理由是a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s,即以前有过一个先例Colson's,虽然有店因为竞争不过关门了,但是总有新店开张。问如何削弱?
要削弱,就是要想办法让原题的理由无法证明它的结论,在这里就要想办法找到Colson's和SpendLess不同的地方,使的两者无法类比。
B说Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been discount stores.即竞争不过Colson's而重开的店越来越多的是折扣店。而Colson's和SpendLess的本质区别就是前者是非折扣店,后者是折扣店。竞争不过非折扣店Colson's的都改成折扣店了,而现在开的一家极具竞争力的SpendLess已经是折扣店了,竞争不过而倒闭的店要再怎么重开法?原文的理由自然就站不住脚了。 |