ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1500|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

ETS对OG-83解释有问题吗?not just... but ...结构是否也正确?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-3-25 20:04:42 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
请教,OG-83中,答案选的B,可以理解。但解释中说:To present these two causes, the sentence employs a formula that requires parallel elements: not just because of x, but because of y, with x and y assuming the same grammatical form. 答案是not just... but also...结构,ETS解释用的是not just... but ...结构。是ETS笔误还是2种结构都可以用?多谢了

In 2000, a mere two dozen products accounted for
half the increase in spending on prescription drugs,
a phenomenon that is explained not just because of
more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are

writing many more prescriptions for higher-cost drugs.
(A) a phenomenon that is explained not just because
of more expensive drugs but by the fact that
doctors are writing
(B) a phenomenon that is explained not just by the
fact that drugs are becoming more expensive
but also by the fact that doctors are writing
(C) a phenomenon occurring not just because of
drugs that are becoming more expensive but
because of doctors having also written
(D) which occurred not just because drugs are
becoming more expensive but doctors are also
writing
(E) which occurred not just because of more
expensive drugs but because doctors have also
written
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-3-25 20:14:41 | 只看该作者
其實 NOT JUST 同 NOT ONLY 意思差不多!
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-2 19:07:15 | 只看该作者
多谢楼上的~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-23 21:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部