ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2249|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

狒狒90题~~ 好难啊。。。。 (我是不是问的太多了?)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-10-7 21:54:29 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
90. Current legislation that requires designated sections for smokers and nonsmokers on the premises of privately owned businesses is an intrusion into the private sector that cannot be justified. The fact that studies indicate that nonsmokers might be harmed by inhaling the smoke from others’ cigarettes is not the main issue. Rather, the main issue concerns the government’s violation of the right of private businesses to determine their own policies and rules.



Which of the following is a principle that, if accepted, could enable the conclusion to be properly drawn?



AGovernment intrusion into the policies and rules of private businesses is justified only when individuals might be harmed.

BThe right of individuals to breathe safe air supersedes the right of businesses to be free from government intrusion.

CThe right of businesses to self-determination overrides whatever right or duty the government may have to protect the individual.

DIt is the duty of private businesses to protect employees from harm in the workplace.

EWhere the rights of businesses and the duty of government conflict, the main issue is finding a successful compromise.


求翻译以及解释。。。。 答案是C
解释是:it makes clear that the right of business is more important than the duty for government to protect individual, building a bridge for the conclusion to be drawn.

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-4-17 22:40:34 | 只看该作者
见这里http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-479435-1-1.html?postid=14286957&searchmode=TopicContent&searchtext=current legislation th
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-9 06:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部