ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3984|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD4-Q5阅读

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-19 12:58:11 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Q3 to Q6:

Extensive research has shown

that the effects of short-term price
promotions on sales are themselves
Lineshort-term.Companies’ hopes that
(5)promotions might have a positive
aftereffect have not been borne
out for reasons that researchers
have been able to identify.A price
promotion entices only a brand’s
(10)long-term or “loyal” customers;
people seldom buy an unfamiliar
brand merely because the price is
reduced.They simply avoid paying
more than they have to when one of
(15)their customary brands is temporar-
ily available at a reduced price.A
price promotion does not increase
the number of long-term customers
of a brand, as it attracts virtually
(20)no new customers in the first place.
Nor do price promotions have linger-
ing aftereffects for a brand, even
negative ones such as damage to
a brand’s reputation or erosion of
(25)customer loyalty, as is often feared.
So why do companies spend so
much on price promotions?Clearly
price promotions are generally run
at a loss, otherwise there would
(30)be more of them.And the bigger
the increase in sales at promotion
prices, the bigger the loss.While
short-term price promotions can
have legitimate uses, such as
(35)reducing excess inventory, it is the
recognizable increase in sales that
is their main attraction to manage-
ment, which is therefore reluctant
to abandon this strategy despite
its effect on the bottom line.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The passage suggests that evidence for price promotions’ “effect on the bottom line” (line 40) is provided by


  1. the lack of lingering aftereffects from price promotions
  2. the frequency with which price promotions occur
  3. price promotions’ inability to attract new customers
  4. price promotions’ recognizable effect on sales
  5. the legitimate uses to which management can put price promotions
Answer: B
请问这题为什么是B呢?找来找去都看不到答案。。谢谢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-2-19 18:52:28 | 只看该作者
即使它在bottom line 时有效~很多公司都不愿意放弃它~对吧 问你它effect on the bottom line 有效体现在哪里
公司不愿意放弃使用~原因是像减少存货一样合理使用~你可以答5 把to后面的错误改正成使用减少存货
也可以答公司对其使用的频率上体现~即使公司不愿放弃使用
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-21 17:12:00 | 只看该作者

可是

thanks edward!
可是原文中什么地方suggest到公司会频繁使用price promotion呢?
谢谢指导
地板
发表于 2010-2-21 19:23:34 | 只看该作者
呵呵,你还是没看清我写的~我写的是频率~b选项说的也是频率~跟频繁没有关系
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-21 21:04:50 | 只看该作者

thanks edward!

6#
发表于 2010-10-30 15:45:56 | 只看该作者
您的话语无伦次,看不懂啊!
7#
发表于 2012-2-14 16:21:25 | 只看该作者
我也没看懂啊。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-5 05:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部