[求助]LSAT-3-I-22我郁闷！卡里面了！！

22.
            In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made pie dough together using rolling pins and other utensils. Each father-son pair used a rolling pin that was distinctively different from those used by the other father-son pairs, and each father repeated the phrase “rolling pin” each time his son used it. But when the children were asked to identify all of the rolling pins among a group of kitchen utensils that included several rolling pins, each child picked only the one that he had used.
    

Which one of the following inferences is most supported by the information above?
    

(A) The children did not grasp the function of rolling pin.
    

(B) No two children understood the name “rolling pin” to apply to the same object.
    

(C) The children understood that all rolling pins have the same general shape.
    

(D) Each child was able to identify correctly only the utensils that he had used.（B）
    

(E) The children were not able to distinguish the rolling pins they used from other rolling pins.
    

According to daquan, the correct answer is B

我的思路：孩子用擀面杖，都是擀面杖，但模样不同，最后从工具里挑擀面杖时，只会挑出自己用过的那一个。

因此可以推出，对孩子来讲，擀面杖这个词只是代表他用过的那一个而已。 

B说没有两个孩子认为擀面杖这词可以用于相同的物体。他们用的擀面杖本来就不同，就算有孩子认为可以用于相同的物体，那他不是还是只挑自己的么，因为擀面杖各不相同啊。怎么就选上B了啊。

在C上卡壳了，C为什么不对啊？如果孩子们认为所有的擀面杖都有相同的形状的话，那么他就会认为所有的擀面杖都应该是他用过的擀面杖的外形，由于“ rolling pin that was distinctively different from those used by the other father-son pairs”，因此他只拿了自己用过的擀面杖。

怎么越想越绕啊！盼讲解，多谢！！

我看了下你的思路 你是按支持题思路来做的

事实上这是一道推理题 上支持下 不能用支持题的思路来做 推理题正确答案的三原则是：a.不能有原文未出现的新事物 b.不能有原文未出现的绝对化用语（only any etc.） c.与原文方向相同

C项有原文未出现的rolling pins' shape  所以要排除  （原文只说rolling pin that was distinctively different from those。。。 没说是哪方面不同 因此不可随意推断） 如果是支持题 不可轻易排除 

B项说明孩子们不会将rolling pin这个词应用到相同的物体上
            可以由原文末尾“让孩子拿全部，孩子们只拿了一个自己用过的”推出 因此正确

另外见我对另一推理题的评述 跟这题很像 

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=373914&page=1

祝好运！

懂啦懂啦！！thx！！！